Suppr超能文献

杀菌剂的物理作用方式:对啤酒花白粉病抑制的影响

Fungicide Physical Mode of Action: Impacts on Suppression of Hop Powdery Mildew.

作者信息

Claassen Briana J, Wolfenbarger Sierra N, Gent David H

机构信息

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2022 Apr;106(4):1244-1252. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2131-RE. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Abstract

Understanding of the physical mode of action of fungicides allows more efficient and effective application and can increase disease control. Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to explore the preinfection and postinfection duration and translocative properties of fungicides commonly used to control hop powdery mildew, caused by . In greenhouse studies, applications made 24 h before inoculation were almost 100% effective at suppressing powdery mildew, regardless of the fungicide evaluated. However, percentage control of powdery mildew based on the number of pathogen colonies per leaf varied significantly between fungicides with increasing time from inoculation to application, ranging from 50 to 100% disease control depending on the fungicide. Fluopyram or fluopyram + trifloxystrobin was particularly efficacious, suppressing nearly all powdery mildew development independent of application timing. In translocation studies, fluopyram and flutriafol were the most effective treatments in each of two separate experiments, resulting in zones of inhibition of 1,036 and 246.3 mm, respectively, on adaxial leaf surfaces when a single droplet of each fungicide was applied to the abaxial surface of leaves. In field experiments, all fungicide treatments provided nearly complete control of powdery mildew infection when applied before inoculation. Levels of disease control decreased with time depending on treatment, showing trends similar to those observed in greenhouse studies. In the 2017 field experiments, high levels of disease control (>75%) were observed at postinoculation time points for all treatments tested, whereas the same fungicides were more sensitive to application timing in a different year. Findings from this research indicate that differences in efficacy between fungicides are small when applications are made preventively, but postinfection activity and translaminar movement of certain fungicides may render some more effective depending on application coverage and preexisting infection.

摘要

了解杀菌剂的物理作用方式有助于更高效、有效地使用杀菌剂,并能增强病害防治效果。开展了温室和田间研究,以探究常用于防治由[病原菌名称未给出]引起的啤酒花白粉病的杀菌剂的感染前和感染后持效期以及内吸特性。在温室研究中,无论评估的是哪种杀菌剂,在接种前24小时施药对抑制白粉病几乎有100%的效果。然而,随着从接种到施药时间的增加,基于每片叶上病原菌菌落数量的白粉病防治率在不同杀菌剂之间差异显著,根据杀菌剂的不同,病害防治率在50%至100%之间。氟吡菌酰胺或氟吡菌酰胺+肟菌酯特别有效,几乎能抑制所有白粉病的发展,且与施药时间无关。在内吸研究中,在两个单独的实验中,氟吡菌酰胺和粉唑醇在各自实验中是最有效的处理,当将每种杀菌剂的一滴施用于叶片背面时,在叶片正面分别产生了1036毫米和246.3毫米的抑菌圈。在田间试验中,所有杀菌剂处理在接种前施药时对白粉病感染几乎都能提供完全防治。病害防治水平随时间下降,具体取决于处理方式,呈现出与温室研究中观察到的趋势相似的情况。在2017年的田间试验中,在接种后的时间点对所有测试处理都观察到了高水平的病害防治(>75%),而在不同年份,相同的杀菌剂对施药时间更为敏感。该研究结果表明,预防性施药时不同杀菌剂之间的药效差异较小,但某些杀菌剂的感染后活性和跨层移动可能会使一些杀菌剂根据施药覆盖范围和既有感染情况而更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验