Sinsareekul Chanakarn, Hiran-Us Sirawut
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Henri-Dunant Road, Wangmai, Patumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Apr;26(4):3515-3521. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04320-w. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
The present study evaluated the efficacy of three different supplementary cleaning protocols on the removal of bioceramic-based root canal filling materials from oval-shaped canals.
A total of 36 human mandibular premolars were instrumented and obturated with gutta-percha and iRoot SP using the single-cone technique. Retreatment was performed with ProTaper Universal retreatment files. The samples were randomly divided into the following supplementary cleaning protocols: conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and XP-endo Finisher R (XPR). The samples underwent micro-CT scanning to quantify the amount of residual filling materials after retreatment and after performing the cleaning protocols. The volume of filling material removal was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni and Games-Howell tests (P < 0.05).
There were significant differences in the amount of root canal filling material removal in every comparison group (P < 0.05). The XPR removed significantly more residual filling materials (P < 0.01) followed by PUI and CSI (P < 0.05). Similar efficacy was found in the total root canal and all root thirds.
The additional use of XP-endo Finisher R and passive ultrasonic irrigation effectively removed the bioceramic-obturated root filling materials from the oval-shaped canals. However, none of the techniques completely removed the filling materials.
The XP-endo Finisher R and passive ultrasonic irrigation exhibited greater efficacy compared with syringe irrigation in the reduction of residual filling materials after retreatment in root-filled teeth with a bioceramic sealer.
本研究评估了三种不同的辅助清洁方案对从椭圆形根管中去除生物陶瓷基根管充填材料的效果。
选取36颗人类下颌前磨牙,采用单锥技术用牙胶尖和iRoot SP进行预备和充填。使用ProTaper Universal再治疗锉进行再治疗。将样本随机分为以下辅助清洁方案:传统注射器冲洗(CSI)、被动超声冲洗(PUI)和XP-endo Finisher R(XPR)。样本进行显微CT扫描,以量化再治疗后以及执行清洁方案后的残余充填材料量。通过单因素方差分析以及事后Bonferroni检验和Games-Howell检验分析充填材料去除量(P < 0.05)。
各比较组在根管充填材料去除量上存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。XPR去除的残余充填材料显著更多(P < 0.01),其次是PUI和CSI(P < 0.05)。在整个根管和所有根管三分部中发现了相似的效果。
额外使用XP-endo Finisher R和被动超声冲洗能有效从椭圆形根管中去除生物陶瓷充填的根管充填材料。然而,没有一种技术能完全去除充填材料。
在使用生物陶瓷封闭剂的根管充填牙再治疗后,与注射器冲洗相比,XP-endo Finisher R和被动超声冲洗在减少残余充填材料方面显示出更大的效果。