Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Jul;147(7):667-700. doi: 10.1037/bul0000256.
Sociopsychological theorizing and research on collective action (e.g., social protests) has mushroomed over the last decade, studying a wide variety of groups, contexts, and cultures. Through a quantitative research synthesis of four motivations for collective action (1,235 effects from 403 samples; total N = 123,707), we summarize and synthesize this body of research into the dual chamber model, a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of collective action. We aim to replicate previous meta-analytic conclusions (about identity, injustice, and efficacy) and break new theoretical ground by (a) integrating a fourth motivation (morality) into the very heart of the psychology of collective action, (b) extending these four motivations to advantaged group members acting in solidarity with the disadvantaged, and (c) integrating theoretically relevant structural (i.e., cultural and other contextual) constraints. Results substantiated the dual chamber model as all four motivations yielded unique, positive, medium-sized effects and interrelationships were positive (particularly among morality and identity, conceptualized as the dual chambers of the protester's beating heart). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling supported the added value of including morality. Moreover, findings confirmed that the strongest specific motivations were emotional injustice and politicized identification, while newly adding moral conviction to that list. Finally, the four motivations extended to advantaged group members acting in solidarity with the disadvantaged, while only the identity motivation was constrained by theoretically relevant cultural dimensions and values (e.g., collectivism and hierarchy). We discuss the implications and limitations of the dual chamber model for integrative theorizing, innovative research, and the practice of collective action. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
过去十年中,社会心理学对集体行动(如社会抗议)的理论和研究如雨后春笋般涌现,研究了各种各样的群体、背景和文化。通过对四种集体行动动机(403 个样本中的 1235 个效应;总 N=123707)的定量研究综合,我们总结和综合了这一领域的研究,提出了双室模型,这是一个全面的、潜在的跨文化集体行动模型。我们的目标是复制之前的元分析结论(关于身份、不公正和效能),并通过以下方式开辟新的理论领域:(a) 将第四种动机(道德)纳入集体行动心理学的核心;(b) 将这四种动机扩展到优势群体成员为弱势群体团结而采取的行动;(c) 将理论相关的结构(即文化和其他背景)约束纳入其中。结果证实了双室模型的有效性,因为这四种动机都产生了独特的、积极的、中等大小的影响,而且相互关系是积极的(特别是在道德和身份之间,它们被视为抗议者跳动的心脏的双室)。元分析结构方程模型支持包括道德的附加价值。此外,研究结果证实,最强的特定动机是情感不公正和政治认同,而将道德信念加入到这个列表中。最后,这四种动机扩展到优势群体成员为弱势群体团结而采取的行动,而只有身份动机受到理论相关的文化维度和价值观(如集体主义和等级制)的限制。我们讨论了双室模型对综合理论、创新研究和集体行动实践的意义和局限性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。