The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Osnabrück University, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;24(4):291-315. doi: 10.1177/1088868320918698. Epub 2020 May 11.
White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women's March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South-advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.
参与“黑人的命也是命”运动的美国白人、参加“妇女大游行”的男性,以及来自北方国家、致力于减少南方国家贫困的人们——这些处于优势地位的群体成员(有时被称为盟友)通常会为弱势群体采取行动。然而,在将优势群体成员纳入这些运动时可能会出现紧张局势,我们认为,这在一定程度上可以用他们参与的动机来解释。我们提出,优势群体成员参与这些运动的动机可能是为了(a)改善弱势群体的地位,(b)在其自身群体地位得到维持的条件下,(c)满足他们自己的个人需求,以及(d)因为这种行为符合他们的道德信仰。在描述我们的文章对心理学文献的理论贡献之前,我们先确定了与这些动机相关的潜在前提和行为结果。