• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国麻醉医师学会地位对颈椎后路减压融合术后医疗费用和住院时间的影响。

The Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists Status on Cost of Care and Length of Stay Following Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:e54-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.100. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.100
PMID:34856400
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) procedures over the past decade have raised the prospect of bundled payment plans. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification system may enable accurate estimation of health care costs, length of stay (LOS), and other postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing PCDF.

METHODS

Low (I and II) versus high (III and IV) ASA class was used to evaluate 971 patients who underwent PCDF between 2008 and 2016 at a single institution. Demographics were compared using univariate analysis. Cost of care, LOS, and postoperative complications were compared using multivariable logistic and linear regression, controlling for sex, age, length of surgery, and number of segments fused.

RESULTS

The high ASA class cohort was older (mean age 62 years vs. 55 years, P < 0.0001) and had higher Elixhauser comorbidity index scores (P < 0.0001). ASA class was independently associated with longer LOS (2.1 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.9, P < 0.0001) and higher cost ($2936, 95% CI $1457-$4415, P < 0.0001). Patients with high ASA class were more likely to have a nonhome discharge (3.9, 95% CI 2.8-5.6, P < 0.0001), delayed extubation (3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.3, P = 0.006), intensive care unit stay (2.4, 95% CI 1.5 3.7, P = 0.0001), in-hospital complications (1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, P = 0.03), and 30-day (3.2, 95% CI 1.5-6.8, P = 0.003) and 90-day (3.2, 95% CI 1.8-5.7, P = 0.0001) readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

High ASA class is strongly associated with increased costs, LOS, and adverse outcomes following PCDF and could be useful for preoperative prediction of these outcomes.

摘要

背景

过去十年中,颈椎后路减压融合术(PCDF)的数量不断增加,这使得捆绑式支付计划成为可能。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)体格状况分类系统可能能够准确估计接受 PCDF 的患者的医疗保健成本、住院时间(LOS)和其他术后结果。

方法

低(I 和 II)与高(III 和 IV)ASA 级用于评估 2008 年至 2016 年在一家机构接受 PCDF 的 971 名患者。使用单变量分析比较人口统计学数据。使用多变量逻辑和线性回归比较医疗费用、LOS 和术后并发症,同时控制性别、年龄、手术时间和融合节段数。

结果

高 ASA 级队列年龄较大(平均年龄 62 岁比 55 岁,P < 0.0001),Elixhauser 合并症指数评分较高(P < 0.0001)。ASA 分级与 LOS 延长独立相关(2.1 天,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.3-2.9,P < 0.0001)和医疗费用增加(2936 美元,95%CI 1457-4415 美元,P < 0.0001)。ASA 分级较高的患者更有可能非家庭出院(3.9,95%CI 2.8-5.6,P < 0.0001)、延迟拔管(3.2,95%CI 1.4-7.3,P = 0.006)、入住重症监护病房(2.4,95%CI 1.5-3.7,P = 0.0001)、院内并发症(1.5,95%CI 1.0-2.2,P = 0.03)、30 天(3.2,95%CI 1.5-6.8,P = 0.003)和 90 天(3.2,95%CI 1.8-5.7,P = 0.0001)再入院。

结论

高 ASA 级与 PCDF 后成本增加、LOS 延长和不良结局密切相关,可用于术前预测这些结局。

相似文献

1
The Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists Status on Cost of Care and Length of Stay Following Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.美国麻醉医师学会地位对颈椎后路减压融合术后医疗费用和住院时间的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:e54-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.100. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Utilization of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system in evaluating outcomes and costs following deformity spine procedures.利用美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类系统评估脊柱畸形手术后的结果和成本。
Spine Deform. 2021 Jan;9(1):185-190. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00176-4. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Assessing Risk Factors for Nonhome Discharge and the Impact of Disposition on Postdischarge Outcomes.颈椎后路减压融合术:评估非家庭出院的风险因素以及处置方式对出院后结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e958-e965. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.214. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
American Society of Anesthesiologists' Status Association With Cost and Length of Stay in Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion: Results From an Institutional Database.美国麻醉师协会地位与腰椎板切除术和融合术的成本和住院时间的关联:来自机构数据库的结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Mar 1;45(5):333-338. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003257.
5
Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.影响择期腰椎后路手术后住院时间的因素:一项多因素分析
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
6
Disparities in Outcomes by Insurance Payer Groups for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.不同保险支付群体的患者行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的结局差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 1;45(11):770-775. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003365.
7
Discharge to Rehabilitation Predicts Increased Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.出院至康复阶段预示着接受后路颈椎减压融合术患者的发病率增加。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):129-136. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001319. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Later Surgical Start Time Is Associated With Longer Length of Stay and Higher Cost in Cervical Spine Surgery.手术开始时间较晚与颈椎手术住院时间延长和费用增加相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):1171-1177. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003516.
9
Modified-frailty index does not independently predict complications, hospital length of stay or 30-day readmission rates following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis.改良衰弱指数不能独立预测腰椎滑脱后路减压融合术后并发症、住院时间或 30 天再入院率。
Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1812-1821. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 16.
10
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.脊柱肿瘤手术后30天再入院及再次手术:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16168.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost analysis of dermal allograft patch utilization in rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复中同种异体真皮补片使用的成本分析
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Sep 14;5(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.011. eCollection 2025 Feb.