Suppr超能文献

儿童虐待新受害者和既往受害者再犯的发生率和预测因素。

Rates and predictors of child maltreatment re-perpetration against new victims and prior victims.

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, United States.

Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, United States.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jan;123:105419. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105419. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited prior research has examined the rates or predictors of re-perpetration of child maltreatment. Yet, perpetrators may have multiple victims, and perpetrators, rather than their victims, are often the primary focus of child welfare services.

OBJECTIVE

We examine rates of child maltreatment re-perpetration of repeat and new victims, and test perpetrator demographics and maltreatment index incident case characteristics as predictors of re-perpetration.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

We use a sample of 285,245 first-time perpetrators of a substantiated maltreatment incident in 2010 from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System.

METHODS

We use linear probability models with full information maximum likelihood to test new victim and same victim perpetration by the end of FY 2018.

RESULTS

Fifteen percent of perpetrators re-maltreated one or more of their original victims ("same victim re-perpetration"); 12% maltreated a new victim. Overall, re-perpetration was more common among younger, female, and White perpetrators. Perpetrators who were the biological or adoptive parent of their initial victim(s) had higher rates of same victim re-perpetration; new victim re-perpetration was more common among perpetrators who initially victimized an adoptive or stepchild. Same victim re-perpetration was less common among perpetrators of physical abuse than other types of maltreatment, and new victim re-perpetration was more common among perpetrators of sexual abuse and neglect than physical abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Child welfare agencies should track re-perpetration in addition to revictimization as part of agency evaluations and risk assessments.

摘要

背景

先前的研究很少涉及儿童虐待行为再次发生的比率或预测因素。然而,施害者可能有多个受害者,而且往往是以施害者而不是受害者为重点的儿童福利服务的主要对象。

目的

我们考察了重复和新受害者的儿童虐待行为再次发生的比率,并检验了施害者人口统计学特征和虐待指数事件特征作为再次发生的预测因素。

参与者和设置

我们使用了 2010 年全国儿童虐待和忽视数据系统中 285245 名首次被证实的虐待事件施害者的样本。

方法

我们使用全信息极大似然线性概率模型来检验 2018 财年末新受害者和同一受害者的施害行为。

结果

15%的施害者重新虐待了一个或多个原受害者(“同一受害者再次施害”);12%的施害者虐待了新受害者。总体而言,再次施害在年龄较小、女性和白人施害者中更为常见。最初受害者是其亲生或领养父母的施害者,其同一受害者再次施害的比率较高;最初施害于领养子女或继子女的施害者,新受害者再次施害的比率较高。与其他类型的虐待相比,身体虐待的施害者再次施害的比率较低,而性虐待和忽视的施害者新受害者再次施害的比率较高。

结论

儿童福利机构应该将再次施害与再次受害一起纳入机构评估和风险评估中进行跟踪。

相似文献

4
Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement.代际儿童保护服务介入模式。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan;99:104247. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Centrality of Child Maltreatment to Criminology.儿童虐待在犯罪学中的核心地位。
Annu Rev Criminol. 2022 Jan;5:371-396. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-120220. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
6
Risk Factors and Services to Reduce Child Sexual Abuse Recurrence.降低儿童性虐待复发风险的因素和服务。
Child Maltreat. 2020 Feb;25(1):106-116. doi: 10.1177/1077559519848489. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
The Organizational Context of Substantiation in Child Protective Services Cases.儿童保护服务案件中证据支持的组织背景。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):7414-7435. doi: 10.1177/0886260519834996. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Cumulative Prevalence of Onset and Recurrence of Child Maltreatment Reports.儿童虐待报告的发病和复发的累积患病率。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;58(12):1175-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Race and child maltreatment reporting: Are Blacks overrepresented?种族与儿童虐待报告:黑人的比例是否过高?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009 Mar;31(3):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Aug 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验