• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生育间隔与既往并发症史与妊娠并发症的关系:基于人群的队列研究。

Association between interpregnancy interval and pregnancy complications by history of complications: a population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e046962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046962.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046962
PMID:34857549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8640667/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine if the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and pregnancy complications varies by the presence or absence of previous complications.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Population-based longitudinally linked cohort study in Western Australia (WA).

PARTICIPANTS

Mothers who had their first two (n=252 368) and three (n=96 315) consecutive singleton births in WA between 1980 and 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We estimated absolute risks (AR) of preeclampsia (PE) and gestational diabetes (GDM) for 3-60 months of IPI according to history of each outcome. We modelled IPI using restricted cubic splines and reported adjusted relative risk (RRs) with 95% CI at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, with 18 months as reference.

RESULTS

Risks of PE and GDM were 9.5%, 2.6% in first pregnancies, with recurrence rates of 19.3% and 41.5% in second pregnancy for PE and GDM, respectively. The AR of GDM ranged from 30% to 43% across the IPI range for mothers with previous GDM compared with 2%-8% for mothers without previous GDM. For mothers with no previous PE, greater risks were observed for IPIs at 3 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43) and 60 months (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.53) compared with 18 months. There was insufficient evidence for increased risk of PE at shorter IPIs of <18 months for mothers with previous PE. Shorter IPIs of <18 months were associated with lower risk than at IPIs of 18 months for mothers with no previous GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations between IPIs and risk of PE or GDM on subsequent pregnancies are modified by previous experience with these conditions. Mothers with previous complications had higher absolute, but lower RRs than mothers with no previous complications. However, IPI remains a potentially modifiable risk factor for mothers with previous complicated pregnancies.

摘要

目的

探讨妊娠间隔(interpregnancy interval,IPI)与妊娠并发症之间的关联是否因既往并发症的存在与否而有所不同。

设计和设置

西澳大利亚州(WA)基于人群的纵向队列研究。

参与者

1980 年至 2015 年期间在 WA 连续分娩两次(n=252368)和三次(n=96315)单胎妊娠的母亲。

结局指标

我们根据每个结局的既往史,估计 IPI 为 3-60 个月时子痫前期(PE)和妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的绝对风险(AR)。我们使用限制立方样条模型来拟合 IPI,并报告了 3、6、12、24、36、48 和 60 个月时调整后的相对风险(RR)及其 95%可信区间,以 18 个月为参考。

结果

首次妊娠中 PE 和 GDM 的风险分别为 9.5%和 2.6%,PE 和 GDM 的复发率分别为 19.3%和 41.5%。与无既往 GDM 的母亲相比,既往 GDM 母亲的 GDM 范围在整个 IPI 范围内的 AR 为 30%-43%,而 2%-8%。对于既往无 PE 的母亲,与 18 个月相比,3 个月(RR 1.24,95%CI 1.07-1.43)和 60 个月(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.29-1.53)的 IPI 风险更高。既往 PE 母亲的较短 IPI(<18 个月)与较短 IPI(<18 个月)与较长 IPI(18 个月)相比,PE 风险增加的证据不足。对于既往无 GDM 的母亲,较短的 IPI(<18 个月)的风险低于 IPI(18 个月)。

结论

IPI 与后续妊娠中 PE 或 GDM 风险之间的关联因既往这些疾病的经历而发生改变。既往有并发症的母亲的绝对风险更高,但 RR 低于既往无并发症的母亲。然而,IPI 仍然是既往复杂妊娠母亲的一个潜在可改变的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab0/8640667/c931bb0fef43/bmjopen-2020-046962f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab0/8640667/eb4fb65d6a2f/bmjopen-2020-046962f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab0/8640667/c931bb0fef43/bmjopen-2020-046962f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab0/8640667/eb4fb65d6a2f/bmjopen-2020-046962f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab0/8640667/c931bb0fef43/bmjopen-2020-046962f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between interpregnancy interval and pregnancy complications by history of complications: a population-based cohort study.生育间隔与既往并发症史与妊娠并发症的关系:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e046962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046962.
2
Association between interpregnancy interval and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Effect modification by maternal age.妊娠间隔与妊娠期高血压疾病之间的关联:母体年龄的效应修正
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;35(4):415-424. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12774. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
3
Effect of interpregnancy interval on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus during a second pregnancy.两次妊娠间隔时间对二胎妊娠期糖尿病发病风险的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06602-z.
4
Interpregnancy interval and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based cohort study.妊娠间隔与妊娠期高血压疾病:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;35(4):404-414. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12668. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Association of interpregnancy interval and gestational diabetes mellitus.妊娠间隔与妊娠期糖尿病的关联。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(26):10545-10550. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2134770. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
6
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study.挪威(2008-2016 年)流产或人工流产后妊娠的孕次间隔与不良妊娠结局:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
The influence of birth outcomes and pregnancy complications on interpregnancy interval: a quantile regression analysis.出生结局和妊娠并发症对孕次间隔的影响:分位数回归分析。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;85:108-112.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Effect of interpregnancy interval on gestational diabetes: a retrospective matched cohort study.妊娠间隔对妊娠期糖尿病的影响:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;39:33-38.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
[Effects of interpregnancy interval on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent pregnancy: a multicenter retrospective study].[妊娠间隔对后续妊娠结局的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 25;56(3):161-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201010-00767.
10
Associations between interpregnancy interval and preterm birth by previous preterm birth status in four high-income countries: a cohort study.四高收入国家中,既往早产史与妊娠间隔时间对早产的影响:队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Jun;128(7):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16606. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of risk factors for recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus.复发性妊娠糖尿病危险因素的荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 8;25(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07367-9.
2
Effect of interpregnancy interval on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus during a second pregnancy.两次妊娠间隔时间对二胎妊娠期糖尿病发病风险的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06602-z.
3
Association of interpregnancy interval with adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the outcomes of the preceding pregnancy: a longitudinal study with 4.7 million live births from Brazil.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpregnancy interval and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based cohort study.妊娠间隔与妊娠期高血压疾病:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;35(4):404-414. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12668. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Effect of interpregnancy interval on gestational diabetes: a retrospective matched cohort study.妊娠间隔对妊娠期糖尿病的影响:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;39:33-38.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Prevalence of gestational diabetes according to commonly used data sources: an observational study.
根据前次妊娠结局分析妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局的关联:一项对巴西470万例活产的纵向研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Feb 1;30:100687. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100687. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.生育间隔与不良妊娠和出生结局风险:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Dec;102(12):1618-1633. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
基于常用数据源的妊娠期糖尿病患病率:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2521-2.
4
Developing evidence-based recommendations for optimal interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: protocol for an international cohort study.制定高收入国家最佳产后间隔的循证建议:一项国际队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e027941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027941.
5
Good practices for the design, analysis, and interpretation of observational studies on birth spacing and perinatal health outcomes.关于生育间隔与围产期健康结局的观察性研究的设计、分析和解释的良好实践。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):O15-O24. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12512. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
6
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.736:优化产后护理。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e140-e150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002633.
7
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局:连续妊娠分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):408-415. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.
8
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines.妊娠期高血压疾病:国际临床实践指南的系统评价
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e113715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113715. eCollection 2014.
9
Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother.再次评估妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局之间的关联:对每位母亲匹配两个间隔的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4333.
10
Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review.欧洲的妊娠期糖尿病:患病率、当前的筛查实践以及筛查障碍。综述。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):844-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03541.x.