INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e050785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050785.
Existing mobility endpoints based on functional performance, physical assessments and patient self-reporting are often affected by lack of sensitivity, limiting their utility in clinical practice. Wearable devices including inertial measurement units (IMUs) can overcome these limitations by quantifying digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) both during supervised structured assessments and in real-world conditions. The validity of IMU-based methods in the real-world, however, is still limited in patient populations. Rigorous validation procedures should cover the device metrological verification, the validation of the algorithms for the DMOs computation specifically for the population of interest and in daily life situations, and the users' perspective on the device.
This protocol was designed to establish the technical validity and patient acceptability of the approach used to quantify digital mobility in the real world by Mobilise-D, a consortium funded by the European Union (EU) as part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative, aiming at fostering regulatory approval and clinical adoption of DMOs.After defining the procedures for the metrological verification of an IMU-based device, the experimental procedures for the validation of algorithms used to calculate the DMOs are presented. These include laboratory and real-world assessment in 120 participants from five groups: healthy older adults; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, proximal femoral fracture and congestive heart failure. DMOs extracted from the monitoring device will be compared with those from different reference systems, chosen according to the contexts of observation. Questionnaires and interviews will evaluate the users' perspective on the deployed technology and relevance of the mobility assessment.
The study has been granted ethics approval by the centre's committees (London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics committee; Helsinki Committee, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre; Medical Faculties of The University of Tübingen and of the University of Kiel). Data and algorithms will be made publicly available.
ISRCTN (12246987).
现有的基于功能表现、身体评估和患者自我报告的移动性终点往往受到敏感性不足的影响,限制了其在临床实践中的应用。可穿戴设备(包括惯性测量单元 (IMU))可以通过量化数字移动性结果 (DMO) 来克服这些限制,这些 DMO 是在监督结构化评估和现实条件下获得的。然而,基于 IMU 的方法在患者人群中的实际有效性仍然有限。严格的验证程序应包括设备计量验证、专门针对感兴趣人群和日常生活情况的 DMO 计算算法的验证以及用户对设备的看法。
本方案旨在建立 Mobilise-D 用于量化现实世界中数字移动性的方法的技术有效性和患者可接受性,Mobilise-D 是欧盟 (EU) 资助的一个联盟,作为创新药物倡议的一部分,旨在促进 DMO 的监管批准和临床应用。在定义基于 IMU 的设备计量验证程序之后,介绍了用于计算 DMO 的算法验证的实验程序。这些程序包括 120 名参与者的实验室和现实世界评估,参与者来自五个组:健康老年人;慢性阻塞性肺疾病、帕金森病、多发性硬化症、股骨近端骨折和充血性心力衰竭。从监测设备中提取的 DMO 将与根据观察环境选择的不同参考系统进行比较。问卷调查和访谈将评估用户对所部署技术的看法以及移动性评估的相关性。
该研究已获得中心委员会的伦理批准(伦敦布卢姆斯伯里研究伦理委员会;赫尔辛基委员会,特拉维夫索拉斯基医学中心;蒂宾根大学和基尔大学的医学系)。数据和算法将公开提供。
ISRCTN(12246987)。