• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clindamycin Mono-Therapy of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.克林霉素单药治疗化脓性汗腺炎患者:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Ann Dermatol. 2021 Dec;33(6):515-521. doi: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.515. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Clindamycin as unique antibiotic choice in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.克林霉素是治疗化脓性汗腺炎的独特抗生素选择。
Dermatol Ther. 2019 Mar;32(2):e12792. doi: 10.1111/dth.12792. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Two Cases of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treated with Adalimumab at the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Clinical Hospital Mostar.皮肤科和性病科在莫斯塔尔临床医院用阿达木单抗治疗两例化脓性汗腺炎。
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2021 Jul;29(2):108-110.
4
Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15% versus topical clindamycin 1% in the management of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study.局部使用 15%间苯二酚与 1%克林霉素治疗轻中度化脓性汗腺炎的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jun;35(6):e15439. doi: 10.1111/dth.15439. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Clindamycin versus clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: Clinical and ultrasound observations.克林霉素与克林霉素加利福平治疗化脓性汗腺炎:临床和超声观察。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1314-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Rates of antibiotic resistance/sensitivity in bacterial cultures of hidradenitis suppurativa patients.化脓性汗腺炎患者细菌培养的抗生素耐药/敏感性率。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 May;33(5):930-936. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15332. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
The Bacteriology of Skin Lesions in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa Is Associated with Previous Antibiotic Treatment in the Community Setting: A Referral Center Experience.在社区环境中,患有化脓性汗腺炎的患者的皮肤病变的细菌学与之前的抗生素治疗有关:一个转诊中心的经验。
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):772-784. doi: 10.1159/000520288. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation.林可霉素对比克林霉素加利福平治疗化脓性汗腺炎:临床和超声评估。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Jan;46(1):96-102. doi: 10.1111/ced.14388. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
9
Evidence-based approach to the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa, based on the European guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa.基于欧洲化脓性汗腺炎指南的化脓性汗腺炎/反向性痤疮循证治疗方法
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016 Sep;17(3):343-351. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9328-5.
10
Clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa.克林霉素与利福平联合治疗化脓性汗腺炎
Br J Dermatol. 2006 May;154(5):977-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07155.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite Body Wash in Managing Hidradenitis Suppurativa.次氯酸钠沐浴露治疗化脓性汗腺炎的真实世界疗效
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2025 Aug;18(8):13-15.
2
Comprehensive and Updated Algorithm of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management from the Experts.专家提供的化脓性汗腺炎综合更新管理算法
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00940-0.
3
European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment.欧洲化脓性汗腺炎/反向性痤疮S2k指南第2部分:治疗
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 May;39(5):899-941. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20472. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Australasian hidradenitis suppurativa management guidelines.澳大利亚化脓性汗腺炎管理指南。
Australas J Dermatol. 2025 Mar;66(2):75-89. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14388. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Lesions.化脓性汗腺炎皮损中的抗菌药物耐药性趋势
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 20;13(14):4246. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144246.
6
Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review on Treatment Landscape and Current Issues.化脓性汗腺炎的全身抗生素治疗:治疗现状与当前问题综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 29;12(6):978. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12060978.
7
Clindamycin Efficacy for Shoulder Device-Related Infections.克林霉素对肩部器械相关感染的疗效。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 30;11(5):608. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050608.

本文引用的文献

1
Clindamycin as unique antibiotic choice in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.克林霉素是治疗化脓性汗腺炎的独特抗生素选择。
Dermatol Ther. 2019 Mar;32(2):e12792. doi: 10.1111/dth.12792. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
2
Clindamycin versus clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: Clinical and ultrasound observations.克林霉素与克林霉素加利福平治疗化脓性汗腺炎:临床和超声观察。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1314-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Rates of antibiotic resistance/sensitivity in bacterial cultures of hidradenitis suppurativa patients.化脓性汗腺炎患者细菌培养的抗生素耐药/敏感性率。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 May;33(5):930-936. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15332. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
Longitudinal profiling reveals a persistent intestinal dysbiosis triggered by conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy.纵向分析显示,常规抗结核治疗会引发持久的肠道菌群失调。
Microbiome. 2017 Jul 7;5(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0286-2.
5
Oral ofloxacin and clindamycin as an alternative to the classic rifampicin-clindamycin in hidradenitis suppurativa: retrospective analysis of 65 patients.口服氧氟沙星和克林霉素替代经典的利福平-克林霉素治疗化脓性汗腺炎:65例患者的回顾性分析
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Jan;178(1):e15-e16. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15739. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Pathophysiology of hidradenitis suppurativa.化脓性汗腺炎的病理生理学
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2017 Jun;36(2):47-54. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2017.017.
7
The bacteriology of hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review.化脓性汗腺炎的细菌学:一项系统评价
Exp Dermatol. 2015 Oct;24(10):727-31. doi: 10.1111/exd.12793. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
Pharmacokinetic variability of clindamycin and influence of rifampicin on clindamycin concentration in patients with bone and joint infections.克林霉素的药代动力学变异性及利福平对骨与关节感染患者克林霉素浓度的影响。
Infection. 2015 Aug;43(4):473-81. doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0773-y. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa.欧洲化脓性汗腺炎/反向性痤疮治疗S1指南。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Apr;29(4):619-44. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12966. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Bacterial pathogens associated with hidradenitis suppurativa, France.法国与化脓性汗腺炎相关的细菌病原体。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;20(12):1990-8. doi: 10.3201/eid2012.140064.

克林霉素单药治疗化脓性汗腺炎患者:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Clindamycin Mono-Therapy of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

作者信息

An Ji Hae, Moon Su Jin, Shin Jung U, Kim Dong Hyun, Yoon Moon Soo, Lee Hee Jung

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, Pocheon, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Dermatol. 2021 Dec;33(6):515-521. doi: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.515. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

DOI:10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.515
PMID:34858002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8577909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A rifampicin (RF)-clindamycin (CL) combination therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although the long-term use of RF requires caution due to the possibility of developing resistant bacteria, only a few studies have investigated alternatives for this combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of systemic CL mono-therapy and assess the prevalence and CL resistance of bacterial growth in HS patients.

METHODS

A total of 53 HS patients treated with CL mono-therapy were included. The efficacy was evaluated by identifying the rate of HS Clinical Response (Hi-SCR) achievers and comparing HS Physician's Global Assessment (HS-PGA) before (W0) and after (W8) the treatment. Purulent material from HS skin lesions was collected on the W0. Bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity were determined by bacterial cultures.

RESULTS

Of 53 HS patients, 34 were eligible for evaluation of the efficacy of the therapy. Twenty-one patients (61.76%) achieved Hi-SCR. The mean scoring of HS-PGA had significantly decreased from 3.24 to 2.15 (=0.001). The prevalence of CL resistance was 15.00%. No significant differences in the efficacy of the therapy according to the presence of CL-resistant bacteria on the W0 were observed (=0.906). Adverse events occurred in 26.42% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Systemic CL mono-therapy may be a safe and useful alternative to RF-CL combination therapy, and no significant difference in the efficacy of the therapy depending on the presence of CL-resistant bacteria was observed.

摘要

背景

利福平(RF)-克林霉素(CL)联合疗法被推荐作为中度至重度化脓性汗腺炎(HS)的一线治疗方法。尽管由于可能产生耐药菌,长期使用RF需要谨慎,但只有少数研究探讨了这种联合疗法的替代方案。

目的

评估全身性CL单药治疗的疗效,并评估HS患者细菌生长中CL耐药性的发生率。

方法

共纳入53例接受CL单药治疗的HS患者。通过确定HS临床反应(Hi-SCR)达标率并比较治疗前(W0)和治疗后(W8)的HS医师整体评估(HS-PGA)来评估疗效。在W0时收集HS皮肤病变的脓性物质。通过细菌培养确定细菌菌群和抗生素敏感性。

结果

53例HS患者中,34例符合治疗疗效评估标准。21例患者(61.76%)达到Hi-SCR。HS-PGA的平均评分从3.24显著降至2.15(=0.001)。CL耐药率为15.00%。未观察到根据W0时是否存在CL耐药菌而导致的治疗疗效有显著差异(=0.906)。26.42%的患者发生了不良事件。

结论

全身性CL单药治疗可能是RF-CL联合疗法的一种安全有效的替代方案,且未观察到根据CL耐药菌的存在与否而导致的治疗疗效有显著差异。