• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用焦点小组评估一项多年的消费者健康外展合作。

Using focus groups to evaluate a multiyear consumer health outreach collaboration.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):575-582. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.987.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.987
PMID:34858086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608199/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Academic health sciences librarians sought to evaluate the efficacy and future of the Health Information Specialists Program, a five-year consumer health information outreach collaboration with public libraries across the state.

METHODS

Five focus groups were held with participants from all five years of the program. Thirty-four participants from the program attended. Facilitators used structured interview guides consisting of eleven questions regarding the impact of the collaboration on participants' abilities to connect themselves or others to health information; the usefulness of materials or knowledge gained and its applications; any consumer health outreach projects that arose from the program; and suggestions for future topics, formats, or modifications. Data was hand-coded and analyzed using the framework analysis methodology for qualitative research.

RESULTS

Participants reported feeling improved confidence and comfort in providing health information services to their patrons. Numerous instances of knowledge transfer-in their personal lives, with their colleagues, and for their patrons-were described. Participants reported improved abilities to both find and evaluate consumer health information, and many adapted class materials for their own programming or teaching. Suggestions were provided for future class topics as well as a program website.

CONCLUSION

Based on data from the five focus groups, the Health Information Specialists Program has positively impacted participants in a number of ways. Primary among these were self-reported improvement in both health information retrieval skills and the ability to evaluate the reliability of health information online, as well as in the confidence to help patrons with their health information needs.

摘要

目的

学术健康科学馆员试图评估健康信息专家计划的效果和未来,该计划是与全州公共图书馆合作开展的为期五年的消费者健康信息外展活动。

方法

对来自该计划所有五年的参与者进行了五次焦点小组讨论。有 34 名计划参与者参加了讨论。主持人使用了包含 11 个问题的结构化访谈指南,这些问题涉及合作对参与者将自己或他人与健康信息联系起来的能力的影响;材料或获得的知识的有用性及其应用;计划产生的任何消费者健康外展项目;以及对未来主题、格式或修改的建议。使用定性研究的框架分析方法对手头的数据进行了编码和分析。

结果

参与者报告说,他们对向其客户提供健康信息服务的能力感到更加自信和舒适。参与者描述了许多知识转移的实例,包括他们的个人生活、与同事以及为客户提供服务的实例。参与者报告说,他们在寻找和评估消费者健康信息方面的能力得到了提高,并且许多人将课程材料改编为自己的编程或教学使用。还为未来的课程主题以及计划网站提供了建议。

结论

根据五个焦点小组的数据,健康信息专家计划在多个方面对参与者产生了积极影响。其中最重要的是,参与者自我报告在健康信息检索技能和在线评估健康信息可靠性的能力方面有所提高,并且在帮助客户满足其健康信息需求方面更有信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8608199/ee9f606e46cf/jmla-109-4-575-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8608199/3229665c716b/jmla-109-4-575-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8608199/ee9f606e46cf/jmla-109-4-575-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8608199/3229665c716b/jmla-109-4-575-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/8608199/ee9f606e46cf/jmla-109-4-575-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Using focus groups to evaluate a multiyear consumer health outreach collaboration.利用焦点小组评估一项多年的消费者健康外展合作。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):575-582. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.987.
2
Cultivating a community of practice: the evolution of a health information specialists program for public librarians.培育实践社群:面向公共图书馆员的健康信息专家项目的发展历程
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):254-261. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.83. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
3
Piloting Consumer Health Information Services in Collaboration with a Community Research Engagement Program.与社区研究参与项目合作开展消费者健康信息服务试点。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Oct-Dec;36(4):348-361. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1369283.
4
Crossing the Brooklyn Bridge: a health literacy training partnership before and during COVID-19.跨越布鲁克林大桥:新冠疫情前后的健康素养培训合作伙伴关系。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):90-96. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1014.
5
Kentucky Public Librarians and Health Information: Experiences, Resource Use, Community Needs, and Roles for Academic Health Sciences Librarians.肯塔基州公共图书馆员与健康信息:学术健康科学图书馆员的经验、资源利用、社区需求和角色。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2024 Jul-Sep;43(3):217-233. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2024.2370755. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Discovering what patrons value in a consumer health library service using laddering interviews.采用阶梯访谈法发现顾客对消费者健康图书馆服务的重视。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Apr 21;111(1-2):612-617. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1495.
7
Promoting rural residents' participation in clinical trials: clinical trials basics programming and training for rural public librarians.促进农村居民参与临床试验:农村公共图书馆员临床试验基础知识编程和培训。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Jul 10;111(3):722-727. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1650.
8
Outreach to community organizations: the next consumer health frontier.与社区组织合作:消费者健康的下一个前沿领域。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):285-9.
9
A 10-year follow-up survey of US academic libraries highlights the COVID-19 experience and greater interest in health information outreach.一项针对美国学术图书馆的 10 年跟踪调查突出了 COVID-19 的经历以及对健康信息外展更大的兴趣。
Health Info Libr J. 2023 Sep;40(3):275-291. doi: 10.1111/hir.12446. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
A partnership between academic and public librarians: "What the Health" workshop series.高校图书馆员与公共图书馆员的合作:“健康是什么”系列研讨会。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):232-237. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.564. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting nutrition literacy in children: a case study of a community partnership between a university and an elementary school.促进儿童营养素养:大学与小学社区伙伴关系的案例研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):117-124. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1678. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Health information seeking behaviour: the librarian's role in supporting digital and health literacy.健康信息寻求行为:图书馆员在支持数字和健康素养方面的作用。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep;36(3):278-282. doi: 10.1111/hir.12278.
2
Public Libraries As Partners for Health.公共图书馆作为健康合作伙伴。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 May 24;15:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170392.
3
Public Library Staff as Community Health Partners: Training Program Design and Evaluation.作为社区健康伙伴的公共图书馆工作人员:培训项目设计与评估
Health Promot Pract. 2018 May;19(3):361-368. doi: 10.1177/1524839917735304. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.图书馆与图书馆员:健康素养研究与实践进展的关键伙伴
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:415-432.
5
Cultivating a community of practice: the evolution of a health information specialists program for public librarians.培育实践社群:面向公共图书馆员的健康信息专家项目的发展历程
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):254-261. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.83. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Beyond Books: Public Libraries As Partners For Population Health.超越书籍:公共图书馆作为促进全民健康的合作伙伴
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):2030-2036. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0724.
7
Evolution of an academic-public library partnership.学术-公共图书馆合作关系的演变
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):62-6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.010.
8
Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.谷歌医生与消费者:一项定性研究,探索慢性病患者的导航需求及在线健康信息寻求行为
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
9
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.