• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强社区抗灾复原力的知识创造要素:一项德尔菲研究。

Knowledge creation elements for enhancing community resilience towards disaster: A Delphi study.

作者信息

Oktari Rina S, Munadi Khairul, Idroes Rinaldi, Sofyan Hizir, Latuamury Bokiraiya

机构信息

Graduate School of Mathematics and Applied Science, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Centre (TDMRC), Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

出版信息

Jamba. 2021 Oct 25;13(1):1137. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1137. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1137
PMID:34858560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603207/
Abstract

Knowledge capacity plays a vital role in building community resilience to disasters. However, the problem is that there is no resilience framework that integrates the knowledge creation process. This article introduces a new framework for increasing community resilience based on knowledge creation theory (KCT). This research aims to define the elements that support the Knowledge Creation for Community Resilience (KCCR) and to gain consensus from experts on these factors. This study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with five panellists and three rounds of Delphi technique to determine the assessment of 26 factors (including six additional factors) that have been identified by experts (30, 18 and 11 experts in rounds I, II and III, sequentially). The data analysis was carried out in several stages, and included Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient, consensus appraisal and interrater agreement (IRA) statistical evaluation. The result of the agreement level (AL) analysis shows that the majority of the constructs (96.15%) are in the 'moderate strong' category. This study shows that there is a significant consensus (with IRA index [ ] ranging from 0.529 to 1), and panellists confirm the significance of all the key constructs. Consensus was gained from experts on seven elements that support the KCCR. This study establishes a systematic, operational and multidimensional KCCR framework that combines the concepts of knowledge creation, community resilience and disaster preparedness. This framework can be used as a qualitative instrument or guidance to build community resilience based on knowledge creation and a quantitative tool for measuring community resilience in facing disasters.

摘要

知识能力在增强社区对灾害的恢复力方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,问题在于目前尚无整合知识创造过程的恢复力框架。本文引入了一个基于知识创造理论(KCT)的增强社区恢复力的新框架。本研究旨在确定支持社区恢复力知识创造(KCCR)的要素,并就这些因素获得专家的共识。本研究通过对五名小组成员进行半结构化访谈以及三轮德尔菲技术来进行,以确定对专家(第一轮、第二轮和第三轮分别为30名、18名和11名专家)已确定的26个因素(包括六个额外因素)的评估。数据分析分几个阶段进行,包括斯皮尔曼等级相关系数、共识评估和评分者间一致性(IRA)统计评估。一致性水平(AL)分析结果表明,大多数构建要素(96.15%)属于“中度强”类别。本研究表明存在显著共识(IRA指数范围为0.529至1),小组成员确认了所有关键构建要素的重要性。就支持KCCR的七个要素获得了专家的共识。本研究建立了一个系统、可操作且多维度的KCCR框架,该框架结合了知识创造、社区恢复力和灾害准备的概念。这个框架可以用作基于知识创造构建社区恢复力的定性工具或指南,以及衡量社区面对灾害时恢复力的定量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/be3d03a98080/JAMBA-13-1137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/ae5f41770a13/JAMBA-13-1137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/cbcfed6121cb/JAMBA-13-1137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/74b44a4b4305/JAMBA-13-1137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/be3d03a98080/JAMBA-13-1137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/ae5f41770a13/JAMBA-13-1137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/cbcfed6121cb/JAMBA-13-1137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/74b44a4b4305/JAMBA-13-1137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/8603207/be3d03a98080/JAMBA-13-1137-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge creation elements for enhancing community resilience towards disaster: A Delphi study.增强社区抗灾复原力的知识创造要素:一项德尔菲研究。
Jamba. 2021 Oct 25;13(1):1137. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1137. eCollection 2021.
2
Developing a tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare rescuers: a modified Delphi study.开发一种衡量医疗救援人员灾害应对能力的工具:一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jan 20;28(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0700-9.
3
Building Community Capacity and Fostering Disaster Resilience.建设社区能力并增强灾害抵御能力。
J Clin Psychol. 2016 Dec;72(12):1318-1332. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22281. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
"One community at a time": promoting community resilience in the face of natural hazards and public health challenges.“一次一个社区”:在应对自然灾害和公共卫生挑战时提高社区的韧性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;23(1):2510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17458-x.
5
Defining pharmacists' roles in disasters: A Delphi study.界定灾难中的药师角色:德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 26;14(12):e0227132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227132. eCollection 2019.
6
Investigating Organizational Learning and Adaptations for Improved Disaster Response Towards "Resilient Hospitals:" An Integrative Literature Review.研究组织学习和适应能力,以提高“韧性医院”的灾害应对效果:综合文献回顾。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Oct;37(5):665-673. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2200108X. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
Island communities and disaster resilience: Applying the EnRiCH community resilience framework.岛屿社区与抗灾能力:应用 EnRiCH 社区抗灾能力框架。
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Jan;39(1):62-70. doi: 10.1111/phn.13007. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
8
What Do We Mean by 'Community Resilience'? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature.我们所说的“社区恢复力”是什么意思?关于其在文献中的定义的系统文献综述。
PLoS Curr. 2017 Feb 1;9:ecurrents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2.
9
Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method.评估社区组织的研究活动和能力:使用德尔菲法完善 CREAT 工具。
J Urban Health. 2019 Dec;96(6):912-922. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0.
10
Development of hospital disaster resilience: conceptual framework and potential measurement.医院灾难恢复力的发展:概念框架与潜在测量方法
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):930-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202282. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting research priorities for prevention and response to child marriage in communities in the Arab region: findings from a multi-stage Delphi study involving practitioners across the region.为阿拉伯地区社区制定预防和应对童婚的研究重点:一项多阶段德尔菲研究在该地区的从业人员中的调查结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2275840. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2275840. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Knowledge management strategy for managing disaster and the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: SWOT analysis based on the analytic network process.印度尼西亚应对灾害和新冠疫情的知识管理策略:基于网络分析法的SWOT分析
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Feb 1;85:103503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103503. Epub 2022 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge management strategy for managing disaster and the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: SWOT analysis based on the analytic network process.印度尼西亚应对灾害和新冠疫情的知识管理策略:基于网络分析法的SWOT分析
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Feb 1;85:103503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103503. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
2
Evaluating the components of social and economic resilience: After two large earthquake disasters Rudbar 1990 and Bam 2003.评估社会和经济恢复力的组成部分:1990年鲁德巴尔和2003年巴姆发生两次大地震灾害之后。
Jamba. 2017 Apr 25;9(1):368. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.368. eCollection 2017.
3
Functional Freedom: A Psychological Model of Freedom in Decision-Making.
功能自由:决策中自由的一种心理学模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Jul 5;7(3):41. doi: 10.3390/bs7030041.
4
The use of Delphi and Nominal Group Technique in nursing education: A review.德尔菲法和名义群体技术在护理教育中的应用:一项综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Aug;60:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 May 1.
5
Factors associated with resilience of adult survivors five years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China.中国2008年四川地震五年后成年幸存者心理韧性的相关因素。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121033. eCollection 2015.
6
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.定义共识:系统评价为 Delphi 研究报告推荐了方法学标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
7
Development of disaster mental health guidelines through the Delphi process in Japan.通过德尔菲法在日本制定灾害心理健康指南。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2012 Jul 2;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-6-7.
8
Knowledge creation and reliable decision-making in complex emergencies.在复杂紧急情况下的知识创造和可靠决策。
Disasters. 2012 Apr;36(2):212-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01255.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Communities that care for families: the LINC Model for enhancing individual, family, and community resilience.关爱家庭的社区:增强个体、家庭和社区弹性的 LINC 模式。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010 Oct;80(4):516-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01054.x.
10
TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process.TENTS 指南:通过德尔菲法制定灾后心理社会照护指南。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):69-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066266.