Peng Ye, Zeng Xiaohui, Peng Liubao, Liu Qiao, Yi Lidan, Luo Xia, Li Sini, Wang Liting, Qin Shuxia, Wan Xiaomin, Tan Chongqing
Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
PET-CT Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 9;11:743765. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.743765. eCollection 2021.
The use of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 has recently been shown to significantly improve the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in this population from the US payer perspective.
A Markov model was created based on a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic melanoma who were resistant to anti-PD-(L)1. Cost information was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and literature-based costs. The utility value was derived from the published literature. The results of the model was the total cost, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The uncertainty of the model was addressed through sensitivity analysis. In addition, we also conducted subgroup analysis.
Ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 provided an improvement of 1.39 QALYs and 2.48 LYs, at a ICER of $73,163 per QALY. The HR of OS was the variable that had the greatest impact on ICER. Compared to ipilimumab, the probability of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 being cost-effective was 94% at the WTP of $150,000/QALY. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the ICER in the majority of the subgroups was less than $150,000/QALY.
Ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 was likely to be cost-effective compared to ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 at a WTP threshold of 150,000/QALY.
最近研究表明,伊匹单抗联合抗程序性死亡蛋白1(anti-PD-1)可显著提高对anti-PD-(L)1单药治疗耐药的转移性黑色素瘤患者的生存率。本研究从美国医保支付方的角度评估了伊匹单抗联合anti-PD-1疗法在该人群中的成本效益。
基于对anti-PD-(L)1耐药的转移性黑色素瘤患者的回顾性分析建立马尔可夫模型。成本信息来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及基于文献的成本数据。效用值来自已发表的文献。模型结果为总成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。通过敏感性分析处理模型的不确定性。此外,我们还进行了亚组分析。
伊匹单抗联合anti-PD-1可使QALY提高1.39个,生命年(LY)提高2.48个,ICER为每QALY 73,163美元。总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)是对ICER影响最大的变量。与伊匹单抗相比,在支付意愿为150,000美元/QALY时,伊匹单抗联合anti-PD-1具有成本效益的概率为94%。亚组分析结果显示,大多数亚组的ICER低于150,000美元/QALY。
对于对anti-PD-(L)1耐药的转移性黑色素瘤患者,在支付意愿阈值为150,000美元/QALY时,与伊匹单抗相比,伊匹单抗联合anti-PD-1可能具有成本效益。