PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) for unresectable large (5.1-10 cm) or huge (>10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with unresectable large or huge HCC who underwent D-TACE-HAIC (D-TACE-HAIC group) or DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) from January 2017 to December 2020. At imaging, tumor infiltrating appearance was classified into smooth tumor margin, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (mean age, 53 years ± 12; 117 men) were included: 69 underwent D-TACE-HAIC and 64 underwent DEB-TACE. The patients who underwent D-TACE-HAIC had higher ORR (71.0% vs 53.1%; = 0.033), longer PFS (median, 9.3 vs 6.3 months; = 0.005), and better OS (median, 19.0 vs 14.0 months; = 0.008) than those who underwent DEB-TACE. In subgroup analysis, patients with non-smooth tumor margin (median, 20.8 vs 13.0 months; = 0.031) or macrovascular invasion (median, 15.0 vs 11.0 months; = 0.015) had significantly longer OS in D-TACE-HAIC group than in DEB-TACE group; but in patients with smooth tumor margin, OS between the two groups was similar (median, 37.0 vs 35.0 months; = 0.458). DEB-TACE, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for poor OS in uni- and multivariable analyses. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (37.7% vs 28.1%;  = 0.242).

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-HAIC was tolerable and led to better OS than DEB-TACE in patients with large or huge HCC, especially in those with non-smooth tumor margin or macrovascular invasion.