Knowledge Translation and Implementation, Centre for Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):568-578. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13917. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
To evaluate the sustainability potential of Choosing Wisely (CW) to address unnecessary medical care at Ontario community hospitals.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Ontario community hospitals and their affiliated family health teams (FHTs).
A mixed-methods study involving the administration of a validated sustainability survey to CW implementation teams followed by their participation in focus groups.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Survey data were collected using an Excel file with an embedded, automated scoring system. We collated individual survey scores and generated aggregate team scores. We also performed descriptive statistics for quantitative data (frequencies, means). Qualitative data were triangulated with quantitative assessments to support data interpretations using the meta-matrix method.
Fifteen CW implementation teams across four Ontario community hospitals and six affiliated primary care FHTs participated. CW priority areas investigated were de-prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and reducing Pre-Op testing and BUN/Urea lab testing. Survey results showed steady improvements in sustainability scores from baseline to final follow-up among most implementation teams: 10% increase for PPI de-prescribing (six FHTs) and 2% increase (three hospital teams); 18% increase in BUN/Urea lab testing (three hospital teams). Regardless of site or CW priority area, common facilitators were fit with existing processes and workflows, leadership support, and optimized team communication; common challenges were lack of awareness and buy-in, leadership engagement or a champion, and lack of fit with existing workflow and culture. All teams identified at least one challenge for which they co-designed and implemented a plan to maximize the sustainability potential of their CW initiative.
Evaluating the sustainability potential of an innovation such as Choosing Wisely is critical to ensuring that they have the best potential for impact. Our work highlights that implementation teams can be empowered to influence implementation efforts and to realize positive outcomes for their health care services and patients.
评估明智选择(Choosing Wisely,CW)在安大略省社区医院解决不必要医疗的可持续性潜力。
数据来源/研究环境:安大略省社区医院及其附属家庭健康团队(FHT)。
一项混合方法研究,包括向 CW 实施团队发放经过验证的可持续性调查问卷,然后让他们参加焦点小组。
数据收集/提取方法:使用带有嵌入式自动评分系统的 Excel 文件收集调查问卷数据。我们整理了个别调查分数,并生成了团队总分。我们还对定量数据(频率、平均值)进行了描述性统计。使用元矩阵方法,将定性数据与定量评估进行三角剖分,以支持数据解释。
来自安大略省四家社区医院和六家附属初级保健 FHT 的 15 个 CW 实施团队参与了研究。调查的 CW 优先领域包括减少质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的处方和减少术前检查和 BUN/Urea 实验室检查。调查结果显示,大多数实施团队的可持续性得分从基线到最终随访都有稳定的提高:PPIs 减药的提高了 10%(六个 FHT)和 2%(三个医院团队);BUN/Urea 实验室检查的提高了 18%(三个医院团队)。无论在哪个地点或 CW 优先领域,常见的促进因素是适应现有流程和工作流程、领导支持以及优化团队沟通;常见的挑战是缺乏意识和认同、领导参与或拥护者,以及与现有工作流程和文化不匹配。所有团队都确定了至少一个挑战,并共同设计和实施了一个计划,以最大限度地提高他们的 CW 倡议的可持续性潜力。
评估明智选择等创新的可持续性潜力对于确保其具有最佳的影响力至关重要。我们的工作强调,实施团队可以被赋予权力,影响实施工作,并为他们的医疗服务和患者带来积极的结果。