Babcock Charles, Gresham Chelsea
West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Charleston WV, USA.
J Pharm Technol. 2015 Dec;31(6):270-275. doi: 10.1177/8755122515589976. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Bradykinin has shown to affect pain hypersensitivity via reducing the pain threshold when it binds to bradykinin B1 receptors. Bradykinin B1 receptors are upregulated following tissue injury. Thus, any mechanism causing an increase in bradykinin could escalate pain perception. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) increase bradykinin by blocking the ACE enzyme from inactivating bradykinin. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) do not increase bradykinin as much and may not make patients as susceptible to chronic pain by the described expected mechanism. This analysis observed retrospective data from a single community pharmacy to determine if there was a difference between patient groups who chronically used ACEIs and ARBs regarding their use of chronic pain medications. Reports were generated containing all prescription fills of ACEIs and ARBs during the 18-month period and length of therapy was determined from that report per patient. The patients meeting the length of therapy requirements were assessed for pain medication usage to determine presence and length of pain medication therapy. The percentage of patients filling chronic pain medications among chronic ACEI patients was 3.99% higher than chronic ARB patients. This was not statistically different. Other evaluated group differences were not statistically significant.
缓激肽已被证明,当它与缓激肽B1受体结合时,会通过降低痛阈来影响疼痛超敏反应。组织损伤后缓激肽B1受体会上调。因此,任何导致缓激肽增加的机制都可能加剧疼痛感知。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)通过阻止ACE酶使缓激肽失活来增加缓激肽。血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)增加的缓激肽没有那么多,可能不会使患者按照所描述的预期机制那样容易受到慢性疼痛的影响。该分析观察了来自单一社区药房的回顾性数据,以确定长期使用ACEIs和ARBs的患者群体在使用慢性疼痛药物方面是否存在差异。生成了包含18个月期间所有ACEIs和ARBs处方配药的报告,并根据该报告确定每位患者的治疗时长。对符合治疗时长要求的患者进行疼痛药物使用评估,以确定疼痛药物治疗的存在情况和时长。长期使用ACEIs的患者中填写慢性疼痛药物的百分比比长期使用ARBs的患者高3.99%。这在统计学上没有差异。其他评估的组间差异也无统计学意义。