Farcas Andreea, Leucuta Daniel, Bucsa Camelia, Mogosan Cristina, Dumitrascu Dan
Drug Information Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Pasteur Street, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Dec;38(6):1390-1397. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0378-2. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
Background Due to recent EU warnings and restrictions on the combined use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-acting agents, and the seriousness of the associated harm, we analyzed the prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as dual therapy or associated with spironolactone. Setting An administrative claims database of a regional hospital in Romania. Methods We retrospectively included all adult patients hospitalized during 18 months in 2013-2014, discharged with a prescription of a RAAS-acting agent. Main outcome measures Counts of ACEIs and ARBs co-prescription, of ACEIs or ARBs combined with spironolactone, co-morbidities, co-medication, creatinine, and electrolytes assessment and values. Results Out of 1697 patients with a prescription of a RAAS-acting agent, 24 (1.4 %) were co-prescribed ACEIs and ARBs, and 416 (24.5 %) ACEIs or ARBs with spironolactone. Patients prescribed dual ACEI/ARB therapy and the ones with ACEI or ARB-spironolactone combination had significantly higher prevalence of increased creatinine level before discharge, compared to the ACEI and ARB monotherapy groups (48 and 31 % compared to 17 and 27 %). Subjects with diabetes, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, or urea ≥40 mg/dL had higher odds of having ACEI or ARB-spironolactone combination compared to monotherapy, while hypertension and renal disease subjects had lower odds. Similar findings were comparing dual ACEI/ARB therapy to monotherapy except heart failure (not statistically significant). Conclusion Overall, the prevalence of use of dual therapy was low. The combined use of RAAS-acting agents was higher in patients with known risk factors for further renal function deterioration, compared to the ones without.
背景 由于近期欧盟对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)作用药物联合使用发出警告并加以限制,且相关危害严重,我们分析了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)作为双联疗法或与螺内酯联合使用的处方情况。
设置 罗马尼亚一家地区医院的行政索赔数据库。
方法 我们回顾性纳入了2013 - 2014年18个月期间住院且出院时开具了RAAS作用药物处方的所有成年患者。
主要观察指标 ACEI和ARB联合处方的数量、ACEI或ARB与螺内酯联合使用的情况、合并症、联合用药、肌酐、电解质评估及数值。
结果 在1697例开具了RAAS作用药物处方的患者中,24例(1.4%)同时开具了ACEI和ARB,416例(24.5%)开具了ACEI或ARB与螺内酯。与ACEI和ARB单药治疗组相比,接受ACEI/ARB双联疗法以及ACEI或ARB - 螺内酯联合治疗的患者出院前肌酐水平升高的患病率显著更高(分别为48%和31%,而单药治疗组为17%和27%)。与单药治疗相比,患有糖尿病、心力衰竭、缺血性心脏病或尿素≥40mg/dL的患者使用ACEI或ARB - 螺内酯联合治疗的几率更高,而高血压和肾病患者的几率较低。除心力衰竭外(无统计学意义),将ACEI/ARB双联疗法与单药治疗进行比较时也有类似发现。
结论 总体而言,双联疗法的使用患病率较低。与无已知进一步肾功能恶化风险因素的患者相比,有这些风险因素的患者中RAAS作用药物的联合使用更为普遍。