Suppr超能文献

化妆品用两种紫外线滤光物质的环境归宿和影响研究述评

Review of the environmental fate and effects of two UV filter substances used in cosmetic products.

机构信息

ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, 65439 Flörsheim, Germany.

ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Böttgerstraße 2-14, 65439 Flörsheim, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 20;808:151931. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151931. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Abstract

Sunscreens containing UV filters, such as octocrylene (OCR) and butyl-methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM), have been increasingly used to protect human skin against UV radiation. Both substances have been detected in monitoring studies in the freshwater and marine environment, and there has been concern about potential effects on aquatic organisms. In the present work, the environmental fate and occurrence, bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity including endocrine effects of OCR and BMDBM are reviewed focusing on the aquatic environment. The two UV filters have low water solubilities and a high sorption potential. The available data indicate that OCR is poorly biodegradable. BMDBM lacks anaerobic and inherent biodegradability. However, it was biodegraded to variable degrees in simulation studies. Measured concentrations in the freshwater and marine environment were found to vary considerably between sites, depending on the extent of recreational activities or wastewater discharges. While the bioconcentration factor of OCR in fish is below the threshold value for bioaccumulation according to EU REACH, the available data for BMDBM do not allow a definitive conclusion on its bioaccumulation potential. Analysis of the aquatic toxicity data showed that data quality was often limited, e.g. in the case of effect concentrations substantially exceeding maximum achievable dissolved concentrations. Up to their limit of water solubility, OCR and BMDBM showed no toxicity to microorganisms, algae, and corals, and no acute toxicity to daphnids and fish. In chronic daphnid tests, OCR was highly toxic, whereas BMDBM lacked toxicity. Reliable water-sediment toxicity tests are required to further evaluate possible effects on benthic invertebrates. The available data do not provide evidence for endocrine effects of the two UV filters on fish. In order to assess potential environmental risks caused by OCR and BMDBM, a validated exposure model for estimating direct emission of UV filters into the aquatic environment and data from systematic, longer-term monitoring studies are needed.

摘要

防晒霜中含有紫外线过滤剂,如奥克立林(OCR)和丁基甲氧基二苯甲酰基甲烷(BMDBM),越来越多地被用于保护人体皮肤免受紫外线辐射。在淡水和海洋环境的监测研究中,已经检测到这两种物质的存在,人们担心它们会对水生生物产生潜在影响。在本工作中,重点关注水生环境,综述了 OCR 和 BMDBM 的环境归宿、发生、生物累积和生态毒性,包括内分泌效应。这两种紫外线过滤剂的水溶性低,吸附潜力高。现有数据表明,OCR 不易生物降解。BMDBM 缺乏厌氧和固有生物降解性。然而,在模拟研究中,它被不同程度地生物降解。在淡水和海洋环境中测量的浓度因娱乐活动或废水排放的程度而异,在不同地点之间差异很大。虽然根据欧盟 REACH,OCR 在鱼类中的生物浓缩因子低于生物累积的阈值,但现有的 BMDBM 数据尚不能确定其生物累积潜力。对水生毒性数据的分析表明,数据质量往往有限,例如,在效应浓度大大超过最大可实现溶解浓度的情况下。在其溶解度极限内,OCR 和 BMDBM 对微生物、藻类和珊瑚没有毒性,对水蚤和鱼类也没有急性毒性。在慢性水蚤试验中,OCR 具有高度毒性,而 BMDBM 则没有毒性。需要进行可靠的水-沉积物毒性试验,以进一步评估对底栖无脊椎动物的可能影响。现有数据并未提供这两种紫外线过滤剂对鱼类产生内分泌效应的证据。为了评估 OCR 和 BMDBM 可能带来的环境风险,需要建立一个经过验证的暴露模型,用于估算紫外线过滤剂直接排放到水生环境中的情况,并需要有来自系统的、长期监测研究的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验