Suppr超能文献

生态与进化中的端粒:假说综述与分类

Telomeres in ecology and evolution: A review and classification of hypotheses.

作者信息

Tobler Michael, Gómez-Blanco David, Hegemann Arne, Lapa Mariana, Neto Júlio M, Tarka Maja, Xiong Ye, Hasselquist Dennis

机构信息

Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Mol Ecol. 2022 Dec;31(23):5946-5965. doi: 10.1111/mec.16308. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

Abstract

Research on telomeres in the fields of ecology and evolution has been rapidly expanding over the last two decades. This has resulted in the formulation of a multitude of, often name-given, hypotheses related to the associations between telomeres and life-history traits or fitness-facilitating processes (and the mechanisms underlying them). However, the differences (or similarities) between the various hypotheses, which can originate from different research fields, are often not obvious. Our aim here is therefore to give an overview of the hypotheses that are of interest in ecology and evolution and to provide two frameworks that help discriminate among them. We group the hypotheses (i) based on their association with different research questions, and (ii) using a hierarchical approach that builds on the assumptions they make, such as about causality of telomere length/shortening and/or the proposed functional consequences of telomere shortening on organism performance. Both our frameworks show that there exist parallel lines of thoughts in different research fields. Moreover, they also clearly illustrate that there are in many cases competing hypotheses within clusters, and that some of these even have contradictory assumptions and/or predictions. We also touch upon two topics in telomere research that would benefit from further conceptualization. This review should help researchers, both those familiar with and those new to the subject, to identify future avenues of research.

摘要

在过去二十年中,生态与进化领域关于端粒的研究一直在迅速扩展。这导致了大量(通常是自行命名的)假说的形成,这些假说涉及端粒与生活史特征或促进适应性过程(以及其潜在机制)之间的关联。然而,源自不同研究领域的各种假说之间的差异(或相似性)往往并不明显。因此,我们在此的目的是概述生态与进化领域中感兴趣的假说,并提供两个有助于区分这些假说的框架。我们将这些假说进行分组:(i)基于它们与不同研究问题的关联,以及(ii)采用一种分层方法,该方法基于它们所做的假设,例如关于端粒长度/缩短的因果关系和/或端粒缩短对生物体性能的拟议功能后果。我们的两个框架都表明,不同研究领域存在并行的思路。此外,它们还清楚地说明,在许多情况下,各集群内存在相互竞争的假说,其中一些甚至具有相互矛盾的假设和/或预测。我们还涉及了端粒研究中两个将受益于进一步概念化的主题。这篇综述应有助于研究人员,无论是熟悉该主题的还是刚接触该主题的,确定未来的研究方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验