Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3609, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Fujita-Gakuen Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 May;407(3):1277-1284. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one-port LLLS (reduced port LLLS, RPLLLS) technique and evaluate its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for junior surgeons.
Between January 2008 and November 2020, the clinical records of 49 patients who underwent LLLS, divided into the conventional LLLS (n = 37) and the RPLLLS group (n = 12), were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics, pathologic results, and operative outcomes were evaluated.
A history of previous abdominal surgery in the RPLLLS group was significantly high (56.8% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.552). Notably, junior surgeons performed 62.2% of the conventional LLLSs and 58.4% of the standardized RPLLLSs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of median operative time (121.0 vs. 113.5, p = 0.387), median blood loss (13.0 vs. 8.5, p = 0.518), median length of hospital stays (7.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.408), and morbidity rate (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.565), respectively.
This standardized RPLLLS is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional LLLS and may become the ideal training procedure for both junior surgeons and surgeons aiming to learn more complex procedures.
腹腔镜左外侧段切除术(LLLS)是一种可行且安全的手术,具有相对平滑的学习曲线。然而,单切口 LLLS 需要广泛的手术经验和先进的技术。本研究旨在报告标准化的单切口加单孔 LLLS(减少孔 LLLS,RPLLLS)技术,并评估其对初级外科医生的安全性、可行性和有效性。
回顾性分析 2008 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间接受 LLLS 的 49 例患者的临床资料,分为常规 LLLS 组(n=37)和 RPLLLS 组(n=12)。评估患者的一般情况、病理结果和手术结果。
RPLLLS 组有既往腹部手术史的患者明显较多(56.8% vs. 91.7%,p=0.552)。值得注意的是,初级外科医生完成了 62.2%的常规 LLLS 和 58.4%的标准化 RPLLLS。两组患者的中位手术时间(121.0 vs. 113.5,p=0.387)、中位出血量(13.0 vs. 8.5,p=0.518)、中位住院时间(7.0 vs. 7.0,p=0.408)和并发症发生率(2.7% vs. 0%,p=0.565)差异均无统计学意义。
这种标准化的 RPLLLS 是常规 LLLS 的一种可行且安全的替代方法,可能成为初级外科医生和希望学习更复杂手术的外科医生的理想培训方法。