Department of Sociology/Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), 403520University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Education and Pedagogy, 8125Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP21293-NP21319. doi: 10.1177/08862605211056729. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
Research describes several sexual and gender identity-based microaggressions that sexual and gender minority (SGM) people might experience. We aimed to examine the occurrence of different sexual and gender identity-based microaggressions among SGM youth and to identify differences by sexual and gender identity, and sex assigned at birth. Open-ended questions about daily experiences were coded for 16 types of sexual and gender identity-based microaggressions in two daily diary studies among Dutch SGM youth (Study 1: = 90, age = 17.64 = 1.78; Study 2: = 393, age = 18.36 = 2.65). Several types of microaggressions were identified, and there was sizable variability in the reported frequency. Overall, lesbian women and bisexual youth were less likely to report microaggressions than gay youth. Bisexual youth were less likely to report use of heterosexist or transphobic terminology than gay youth and youth assigned male at birth were less likely to report invalidation of LGBTQ identity than youth assigned female at birth. Last, gender minority youth were more likely to report familial microaggressions, invalidation of LGBTQ identity, and threatening behaviors than cisgender youth. Overall, this study provides empirical support using mixed qualitative and quantitative methods for theorized typologies of microaggressions among Dutch SGM youth.
研究描述了性少数群体和跨性别群体可能经历的几种基于性取向和性别认同的微侵犯。我们旨在研究性少数群体和跨性别青年中不同的基于性取向和性别认同的微侵犯的发生情况,并确定基于性取向和性别认同以及出生时分配的性别的差异。在两项针对荷兰性少数群体和跨性别青年的日常日记研究中,针对日常经历的开放性问题进行了 16 种基于性取向和性别认同的微侵犯的编码(研究 1:=90,年龄=17.64=1.78;研究 2:=393,年龄=18.36=2.65)。确定了几种类型的微侵犯,并且报告的频率存在很大差异。总体而言,女同性恋者和双性恋青年比男同性恋青年报告的微侵犯较少。与男同性恋青年相比,双性恋青年报告使用异性恋或恐跨性别术语的可能性较小,而与女性出生时分配的性别相比,男性出生时分配的性别报告否认 LGBTQ 身份的可能性较小。最后,性别少数群体青年比顺性别青年更有可能报告家庭微侵犯、否认 LGBTQ 身份和威胁行为。总的来说,这项研究使用混合定性和定量方法为荷兰性少数群体和跨性别青年的微侵犯理论类型提供了实证支持。