González-Fernández Cristina, Gómez-Pastora Jenifer, Bringas Eugenio, Zborowski Maciej, Chalmers Jeffrey J, Ortiz Inmaculada
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, ETSIIT, University of Cantabria, Avda. Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain.
William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, 151 W. Woodruff Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Ind Eng Chem Res. 2021 Nov 24;60(46):16780-16790. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c03474. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
The design of microdevices in which components with magnetic character must be separated and recovered from reactive media benefits from the advantages of microfluidics and meets the criteria for process intensification; however, there are open questions, such as the design of the most appropriate magnet arrangement, that need further research in order to increase the magnetic gradient exerted on the particles. Herein, we focus on the continuous recovery of magnetic microparticles, that can be used as support to facilitate the recovery of biocatalysts (magnetic microcatalysts, MMCs) from biological fluids. We analyze and compare the performance of two typical magnetophoretic microdevices for addressing bead recovery: (i) annular channels with a quadrupole orientation of the permanent magnets (quadrupole magnetic sorter, QMS) and (ii) the standard design, which consists of rectangular channels with a single permanent magnet to generate the magnetic field. To this end, an experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model has been employed. Our results reveal that for devices with the same width and length, the micro-QMS, in comparison to a rectangular channel, could accomplish the complete particle retrieval while (i) processing more than 4 times higher fluid velocities, treating more than 360 times higher flow rates or (ii) working with smaller particles, thus reducing by 55% the particle mass. Additionally, the parallel performance of ≈300 micro-QMSs fulfills the processing of flow rates as high as 200 L·h while entirely capturing the magnetic beads. Thereby, this work shows the potential of the QMS advanced design in the intensification of the recovery of catalysts supports of magnetic character.
在微型器件的设计中,必须将具有磁性的组件与反应性介质分离并回收,这得益于微流控技术的优势,且符合过程强化的标准;然而,仍存在一些未解决的问题,比如最合适的磁体排列设计,为了增加施加在颗粒上的磁梯度,这些问题需要进一步研究。在此,我们专注于磁性微粒的连续回收,这些微粒可作为载体,便于从生物流体中回收生物催化剂(磁性微催化剂,MMCs)。我们分析并比较了两种用于磁泳微器件的典型磁体排列设计,以实现磁珠回收:(i)永磁体呈四极取向的环形通道(四极磁分选器,QMS)和(ii)标准设计,即由带有单个永磁体以产生磁场的矩形通道组成。为此,我们采用了经过实验验证的计算流体动力学(CFD)数值模型。我们的结果表明,对于具有相同宽度和长度的器件,与矩形通道相比,微型QMS能够在(i)处理流速高出4倍以上、处理流量高出360倍以上的情况下,或者(ii)使用更小的颗粒时,完成颗粒的完全回收,从而使颗粒质量减少55%。此外,约300个微型QMS的并行性能能够满足高达200 L·h的流量处理要求,同时完全捕获磁珠。因此,这项工作展示了QMS先进设计在强化磁性催化剂载体回收方面的潜力。