Li Jim Zhang Hao, Giuliani Meredith, Ingledew Paris-Ann
Department of Surgery, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, CAN.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, CAN.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 30;13(10):e19150. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19150. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Introduction The internet has become a mainstay source of health information for cancer patients. Online patient education videos are common; however, there have been no studies examining the quality of publicly available videos on radiotherapy for lung cancer (one of the most common forms of cancer). To fill this knowledge gap, we aim to systematically map and objectively assess videos discussing radiotherapy for lung cancer on YouTube. Methods The terms "radiotherapy for lung cancer," "radiation for lung cancer," "radiation therapy for lung cancer," and "radiation treatment for lung cancer" were searched on YouTube using a clear-cache browser. Results were sorted by relevance and the top 50 English-language results for each search were recorded. After removing duplicates, each video was assessed for length, Video Power Index (VPI, which is the product of a video's average daily views and like and dislike ratio), source, content, comment moderation, and misinformation. Two raters were used to ensure consistency. Results were evaluated using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results A total of 88 unique videos resulted from the search. The median video length was 4 minutes and 5 seconds. The average VPI was 10.9 (95% CI: 1.5-20.4) and the median number of views was 954.5. All videos were published between July 8, 2009 and November 18, 2020. Of the videos, 44% were published within the past two years. A total of 61% of the videos were from the USA, 14% were from the UK, 6% from Australia, 5% each from Canada and India, and other countries make up the remaining 10%. Most of the videos were published by healthcare facilities (39%) and non-profit organizations (31%). Content-wise, 95% of videos contain information specific to lung cancer. A total of 46 videos (52%) were targeted toward patient education. Of which, 37 covered radiotherapy for lung cancer, 12 covered side effects for radiotherapy, and 11 covered both. The other 42 videos (48%) were designed for a professional audience. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was the most commonly described radiotherapy modality (42%), and the physician interview was the most common format, being used in 59% of videos. Out of the 38 videos with at least one comment, only two (5%) were moderated by the host channel. None of the videos featured misleading information. Conclusions This study comprehensively surveyed YouTube videos pertaining to radiotherapy for lung cancer to provide a high-level overview of the information that patients may find online. Although nearly half of the videos describe lung cancer radiotherapy for patients, only a small proportion comprehensively cover both radiotherapy and its side effects. The results of our study can help guide the development of patient education tools and encourage healthcare providers to recognize the limitations of online health information and proactively address patient questions regarding radiotherapy. Future research could examine videos on other lung cancer treatment options or radiotherapy for other cancers.
引言 互联网已成为癌症患者获取健康信息的主要来源。在线患者教育视频很常见;然而,尚未有研究对公开可得的肺癌放疗视频(最常见的癌症形式之一)的质量进行考察。为填补这一知识空白,我们旨在系统梳理并客观评估YouTube上讨论肺癌放疗的视频。
方法 使用清除缓存的浏览器在YouTube上搜索“肺癌放疗”“肺癌放射治疗”“肺癌放射疗法”以及“肺癌放射治疗法”。结果按相关性排序,记录每次搜索的前50条英文结果。去除重复项后,对每个视频的时长、视频影响力指数(VPI,即视频的日均观看量与点赞和差评比例的乘积)、来源、内容、评论审核及错误信息进行评估。使用两名评分者以确保一致性。结果采用描述性和推断性统计进行评估。
结果 搜索共得到88个独特视频。视频的中位数时长为4分5秒。平均VPI为10.9(95%置信区间:1.5 - 20.4),观看量中位数为954.5。所有视频均于2009年7月8日至2020年11月18日发布。其中,44%的视频是在过去两年内发布的。共有61%的视频来自美国,14%来自英国,6%来自澳大利亚,加拿大和印度各占5%,其他国家占其余的10%。大多数视频由医疗机构(39%)和非营利组织(31%)发布。从内容来看,9