• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube上关于肩袖撕裂视频的质量与可靠性评估

Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears.

作者信息

Kuru Tolgahan, Erken H Yener

机构信息

Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Feb 3;12(2):e6852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6852.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.6852
PMID:32181087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7053698/
Abstract

Introduction The objective of this study was to investigate quality and scientific accuracy of videos related to rotator cuff tear on YouTube. Methods Term of "rotator cuff tear" was entered to the searching bar of YouTube and the first 50 YouTube videos about rotator cuff tear with the highest view counts were recorded and evaluated by two orthopedists. Title of the videos that met the inclusion criteria were recorded. The videos were evaluated with DISCERN and JAMA scoring system, and Video Power Index. Results The mean DISCERN score was calculated as 35.7±8.9, and the mean JAMA score was found as 2.9±0.4. The mean DISCERN score was statistically significantly higher in the physician group compared to the non-physician group. There was a very strong and statistically significant correlation and an excellent compliance between both observers. Conclusion In general, quality of videos published on YouTube about rotator cuff tear was low.

摘要

引言 本研究的目的是调查YouTube上与肩袖撕裂相关视频的质量和科学准确性。方法 在YouTube搜索栏中输入“肩袖撕裂”一词,记录前50个观看次数最多的关于肩袖撕裂的YouTube视频,并由两名骨科医生进行评估。记录符合纳入标准的视频标题。使用DISCERN和JAMA评分系统以及视频影响力指数对视频进行评估。结果 DISCERN评分的平均值计算为35.7±8.9,JAMA评分的平均值为2.9±0.4。与非医生组相比,医生组的DISCERN评分平均值在统计学上显著更高。两位观察者之间存在非常强且具有统计学意义的相关性和极好的一致性。结论 总体而言,YouTube上发布的关于肩袖撕裂的视频质量较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/4b106ac84428/cureus-0012-00000006852-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/dbaa67f4d9a4/cureus-0012-00000006852-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/111c991b9ca5/cureus-0012-00000006852-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/4b106ac84428/cureus-0012-00000006852-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/dbaa67f4d9a4/cureus-0012-00000006852-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/111c991b9ca5/cureus-0012-00000006852-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6060/7053698/4b106ac84428/cureus-0012-00000006852-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears.YouTube上关于肩袖撕裂视频的质量与可靠性评估
Cureus. 2020 Feb 3;12(2):e6852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6852.
2
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
3
Online Videos Regarding Relevant Postoperative Patient Information and Postoperative Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Provide Poor Information Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability.在线视频提供的有关关节镜肩袖修复术后相关患者信息和术后康复的信息质量差、准确性低、可靠性差。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Dec;39(12):2443-2453.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.031. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease.YouTube视频提供了关于肩袖疾病的低质量教育内容。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):217-223. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00927. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.YouTube上关于先天性鼻泪管阻塞视频的可靠性和质量评估
Cureus. 2023 Mar 19;15(3):e36365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36365. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Can Chat-GPT assist orthopedic surgeons in evaluating the quality of rotator cuff surgery patient information videos?Chat-GPT能否协助骨科医生评估肩袖手术患者信息视频的质量?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan;34(1):141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
8
Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer.与胰腺癌相关的YouTube内容的可靠性和质量。
Cureus. 2021 Mar 24;13(3):e14085. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14085.
9
Female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS): Evaluation of YouTube videos.女性生殖器整形手术(FGCS):对 YouTube 视频的评估。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr;50(4):102102. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102102. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
Evaluation of the Accuracy and Quality of Information in Videos About Lateral Epicondylitis Shared on Internet Video Sharing Services.互联网视频分享服务上关于外侧上髁炎的视频信息准确性和质量评估
Cureus. 2022 Feb 24;14(2):e22583. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22583. eCollection 2022 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content.YouTube上关于膝骨关节炎的富血小板血浆视频在质量和内容方面是可以接受的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043437.
2
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.评估YouTube上关于骨坏死和缺血性坏死内容的质量:使用DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS工具进行的多维度分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0.
3
Evaluation of the Educational Value, Reliability, and Quality of Vaginally-Assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (v-NOTES) Videos on YouTube.

本文引用的文献

1
A Quality Analysis of Disc Herniation Videos on YouTube.YouTube 上椎间盘突出症视频的质量分析
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e799-e804. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.146. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Education.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的YouTube视频作为患者教育的来源。
Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):987-991. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.987. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review.医学类YouTube视频及其评估方法:文献综述
YouTube上经阴道辅助的自然腔道内镜手术(v-NOTES)视频的教育价值、可靠性及质量评估
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85244. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85244. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Analysis of Plantar Fasciitis Videos on YouTube: Quality and Reliability Assessment.YouTube上足底筋膜炎视频的分析:质量与可靠性评估
Cureus. 2025 Feb 14;17(2):e78993. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78993. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Evaluating YouTube as a source of information on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.评估YouTube作为肌萎缩侧索硬化症信息来源的情况。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 28;11:20552076251324439. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324439. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessing the quality, reliability, and transparency of YouTube videos on spiritual palliative care: a content analysis.评估YouTube上关于灵性姑息治疗视频的质量、可靠性和透明度:一项内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 11;13:1497855. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1497855. eCollection 2025.
7
Evaluating YouTube Videos for Resident Education in Free Flap Surgery.评估用于游离皮瓣手术住院医师教育的YouTube视频
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb 14;10(1):e70079. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70079. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Evaluating YouTube Videos With Prophylactic Mastectomy Content in Terms of Their Quality and Reliability.评估具有预防性乳房切除术内容的YouTube视频的质量和可靠性。
Breast J. 2025 Jan 9;2025:9487931. doi: 10.1155/tbj/9487931. eCollection 2025.
9
Quality and impact of youtube for patient education on prostatic artery embolization.YouTube用于前列腺动脉栓塞术患者教育的质量与影响
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04790-y.
10
Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding total ankle arthroplasty.评估ChatGPT对有关全踝关节置换术常见患者问题的回答。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 31;12(1):e70138. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70138. eCollection 2025 Jan.
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Feb 12;4(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mededu.8527.
4
'How to stop a nosebleed': an assessment of the quality of epistaxis treatment advice on YouTube.《如何止住鼻出血》:YouTube上鼻出血治疗建议的质量评估
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Aug;130(8):749-54. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116008410. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
5
Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization.YouTube上与神经源性膀胱和间歇性导尿相关视频的教育内容评估
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):320-54. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2955.
6
Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus.评估与拇外翻相关的在线资源的质量、准确性和可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2016 Feb;9(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/1938640015592840. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis.YouTube作为透析信息来源:一项内容分析。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 May;20(5):315-20. doi: 10.1111/nep.12397.
8
Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension?视频分享网站是高血压信息的有用来源吗?
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Jul;8(7):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease.YouTube作为胆结石疾病患者信息的来源。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4066-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4066.
10
Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review.YouTube 上的医疗保健信息:一项系统综述。
Health Informatics J. 2015 Sep;21(3):173-94. doi: 10.1177/1460458213512220. Epub 2014 Mar 25.