Lai Hung-Wen, Chen Shou-Tung, Lin Ying-Jen, Lin Shih-Lung, Lin Ching-Min, Chen Dar-Ren, Kuo Shou-Jen
Endoscopic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 19;11:739144. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.739144. eCollection 2021.
Endoscopic assisted breast surgery (EABS) or robotic assisted breast surgery (RABS) performed through minimal axillary and/or peri-areolar incisions has become the representative of minimal access breast surgery (MABS). We report the trend and clinical outcome of MABS for treatment of breast cancer.
Information on patients who underwent breast cancer operation by the principal investigator during the period of 2011 to 2020 was collected from a single institute for analysis. The clinical outcome, trend, and cost of MABS were analyzed and compared with conventional breast surgery (CBS).
A total of 824 breast cancer patients operated by a single surgeon were enrolled in this study: 254 received CBS and 570 received MABS, namely, 476 EABS and 94 RABS. From 2011 to 2020, the number of MABS performed annually has shown an increasing trend. Compared with CBS, MABS such as breast conserving surgery and nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) have effectively reduced wound scar length. Since the sequential uprise from conventional NSM (C-NSM), dual-axillary-areolar-incision two dimensional (2D) endoscopic assisted NSM (E-NSM), single-axillary-incision E-NSM, robotic assisted NSM (R-NSM), and single-port 3D E-NSM, the development of minimal access mastectomies increasingly paralleled with NSM. The operation time of various MABS decreased significantly and showed no statistical difference compared with CBS. R-NSM was associated with highest cost, followed by 3D E-NSM, E-NSM, and C-NSM. The positive surgical margin rate and local recurrence rate of MABS and CBS were not statistically different.
MABS showed comparable clinical outcome and preliminary oncologic safety as CBS and has been increasingly performed as the surgical treatment of breast cancer, especially minimal access NSM.
通过最小腋窝和/或乳晕周围切口进行的内镜辅助乳腺手术(EABS)或机器人辅助乳腺手术(RABS)已成为微创乳腺手术(MABS)的代表。我们报告了MABS治疗乳腺癌的趋势和临床结果。
收集2011年至2020年期间由主要研究者进行乳腺癌手术的患者信息,来自单一机构进行分析。分析MABS的临床结果、趋势和成本,并与传统乳腺手术(CBS)进行比较。
本研究共纳入由单一外科医生进行手术的824例乳腺癌患者:254例接受CBS,570例接受MABS,即476例EABS和94例RABS。从2011年到2020年,每年进行的MABS数量呈上升趋势。与CBS相比,诸如保乳手术和保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM)等MABS有效地减少了伤口疤痕长度。从传统NSM(C-NSM)、双腋窝乳晕切口二维(2D)内镜辅助NSM(E-NSM)、单腋窝切口E-NSM、机器人辅助NSM(R-NSM)和单端口3D E-NSM依次兴起以来,微创乳房切除术的发展越来越与NSM并行。各种MABS的手术时间显著缩短,与CBS相比无统计学差异。R-NSM成本最高,其次是3D E-NSM、E-NSM和C-NSM。MABS和CBS的手术切缘阳性率和局部复发率无统计学差异。
MABS显示出与CBS相当的临床结果和初步肿瘤学安全性,并且越来越多地作为乳腺癌的手术治疗方式,尤其是微创NSM。