Grunauer Michelle, Mikesell Caley, Bustamante Gabriela, Aronowitz Danielle, Zambrano Kevin, Icaza-Freire Andrea P, Gavilanes Antonio W D, Barrera Rafael
School of Medicine, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de los Valles, Quito, Ecuador.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 15;9:742916. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.742916. eCollection 2021.
Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) provide multidisciplinary care to critically ill children and their families. Grief is present throughout the trajectory of illness and can peak around the time of death or non-death losses. The objective of this study was to assess how PICUs around the world implement grief and bereavement care (GBC) as part of an integrated model of care. This is a multicenter cross-sectional, prospective survey study. Questionnaires with multiple-choice and open-ended questions focusing on unit infrastructure, personnel, policies, limited patient data, and practices related to GBC for families and health care professionals (HCPs) were completed by on-site researchers, who were HCPs on the direct care of patients. PICU fulfillment of GBC goals was evaluated using a custom scoring based on indicators developed by the Initiative for Pediatric Palliative Care (IPPC). We compared average total and individual items fulfillment scores according to the respective country's World Bank income. Patient characteristics and details of unit infrastructure were also evaluated as potential predictors of total GBC fulfillment scores. Statistical analysis included multilevel generalized linear models (GLM) with a Gaussian distribution adjusted by child age/gender and clustering by center, using high income countries (HICs) as the comparative reference. Additionally, we applied principals of content analysis to analyze and summarize open-ended answers to contextualize qualitative data. The study included 34 PICUs from 18 countries: high-income countries (HICs): 32.4%, upper middle-income countries (UMICs): 44.1%, low middle-income and low-income countries (LMI/LICs): 23.5%. All groups reported some compliance with GBC goals; no group reported perfect fulfillment. We found statistically significant differences in GBC fulfillment scores between HICs and UMICs (specifically, HCP grief support), and between HICs and LMICs (specifically, family grief support and HCP grief support). PICUs world-wide provide some GBC, independent of income, but barriers include lack of financial support, time, and training, overall unit culture, presence of a palliative care consultation service, and varying cultural perceptions of child death. Disparities in GBC for families and HCPs exist and were related to the native countries' income level. Identifying barriers to support families and HCPs, can lead to opportunities of improving GBC in PICUs world-wide.
儿科重症监护病房(PICUs)为重症患儿及其家庭提供多学科护理。悲伤贯穿疾病的整个过程,可能在患儿死亡或经历非死亡性丧失时达到顶峰。本研究的目的是评估全球各地的儿科重症监护病房如何将悲伤与丧亲照护(GBC)作为综合护理模式的一部分来实施。这是一项多中心横断面前瞻性调查研究。由直接护理患者的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)担任现场研究人员,他们完成了包含多项选择题和开放式问题的问卷,这些问题聚焦于病房基础设施、人员、政策、有限的患者数据以及针对家庭和医疗保健专业人员的悲伤与丧亲照护相关实践。使用基于儿科姑息治疗倡议(IPPC)制定的指标的自定义评分来评估儿科重症监护病房对悲伤与丧亲照护目标的达成情况。我们根据各国的世界银行收入情况比较了平均总分和各单项的达成分数。还评估了患者特征和病房基础设施细节作为悲伤与丧亲照护总达成分数的潜在预测因素。统计分析包括多级广义线性模型(GLM),采用高斯分布,根据儿童年龄/性别进行调整,并按中心进行聚类,以高收入国家(HICs)作为比较参考。此外,我们运用内容分析原理来分析和总结开放式答案,以便将定性数据置于具体情境中。该研究纳入了来自18个国家的34个儿科重症监护病房:高收入国家(HICs)占32.4%,中高收入国家(UMICs)占44.1%,中低收入和低收入国家(LMI/LICs)占23.5%。所有组均报告在一定程度上符合悲伤与丧亲照护目标;没有一组报告完全达成。我们发现高收入国家与中高收入国家之间(具体而言,医疗保健专业人员的悲伤支持方面)以及高收入国家与低收入和中等收入国家之间(具体而言,家庭悲伤支持和医疗保健专业人员的悲伤支持方面)在悲伤与丧亲照护达成分数上存在统计学显著差异。全球范围内的儿科重症监护病房都提供了一些悲伤与丧亲照护,与收入无关,但障碍包括缺乏资金支持、时间和培训、整体病房文化、是否设有姑息治疗咨询服务以及对儿童死亡的不同文化认知。在为家庭和医疗保健专业人员提供悲伤与丧亲照护方面存在差异,且与本国的收入水平有关。识别支持家庭和医疗保健专业人员的障碍,可为改善全球儿科重症监护病房的悲伤与丧亲照护带来机遇。