Mehta Puja K, Wei Janet, Shufelt Chrisandra, Quesada Odayme, Shaw Leslee, Bairey Merz C Noel
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute and Emory Women's Heart Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 17;8:744788. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.744788. eCollection 2021.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among both women and men, yet women continue to have delays in diagnosis and treatment. The lack of recognition of sex-specific biological and socio-cultural gender-related differences in chest pain presentation of CAD may, in part, explain these disparities. Sex and gender differences in pain mechanisms including psychological susceptibility, the autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity, and visceral innervation likely contribute to chest pain differences. CAD risk scores and typical/atypical angina characterization no longer appear relevant and should not be used in women and men. Women more often have ischemia with no obstructive CAD (INOCA) and myocardial infarction, contributing to diagnostic and therapeutic equipoise. Existing knowledge demonstrates that chest pain often does not relate to obstructive CAD, suggesting a more thoughtful approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy for chest pain in stable obstructive CAD. Emerging knowledge regarding the central and ANS and visceral pain processing in patients with and without angina offers explanatory mechanisms for chest pain and should be investigated with interdisciplinary teams of cardiologists, neuroscientists, bio-behavioral experts, and pain specialists. Improved understanding of sex and gender differences in chest pain, including biological pathways as well as sociocultural contributions, is needed to improve clinical care in both women and men.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是男性和女性发病和死亡的主要原因,但女性在诊断和治疗方面仍存在延误。对CAD胸痛表现中性别特异性生物学和社会文化性别相关差异缺乏认识可能部分解释了这些差异。疼痛机制中的性别差异,包括心理易感性、自主神经系统(ANS)反应性和内脏神经支配,可能导致胸痛差异。CAD风险评分以及典型/非典型心绞痛的特征似乎不再相关,不应在男性和女性中使用。女性更常出现无阻塞性CAD的心肌缺血(INOCA)和心肌梗死,这导致了诊断和治疗的平衡。现有知识表明,胸痛通常与阻塞性CAD无关,这表明对于稳定型阻塞性CAD的胸痛,应采取更谨慎的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和药物治疗方法。关于有或无心绞痛患者的中枢和ANS以及内脏疼痛处理的新知识为胸痛提供了解释机制,应由心脏病专家、神经科学家、生物行为专家和疼痛专家组成的跨学科团队进行研究。需要更好地理解胸痛中的性别差异,包括生物学途径以及社会文化因素,以改善男性和女性的临床护理。