Suppr超能文献

对克里特岛陆生蜗牛辐射中用于界定物种的基于DNA的方法进行比较,揭示了单纯分子分类学的不足之处。

A comparison of DNA-based methods for delimiting species in a Cretan land snail radiation reveals shortcomings of exclusively molecular taxonomy.

作者信息

Sauer Jan, Hausdorf Bernhard

机构信息

Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Chemical Ecology, University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Cladistics. 2012 Jun;28(3):300-316. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00382.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Abstract

We compared the results of different approaches for delimiting species based on single-locus DNA sequences with those of methods using binary multilocus data. As case study, we examined the radiation of the land snail genus Xerocrassa on Crete. Many of the methods based on mitochondrial sequences resulted in heavy under- or overestimations of the species number. The methods using AFLP data produced classifications with an on average higher concordance with the morphological classification than the methods based on mitochondrial sequences. However, the percentage of correct species classifications is low even with binary multilocus data. Gaussian clustering produced the classifications with the highest concordance with the morphological classification of all approaches applied in this study, both with single-locus sequences and with binary multilocus data. There are two general problems that hamper species delimitation, namely rarity and the hierarchical structure of biodiversity. Methods for species delimitation using genetic data search for clusters of individuals, but do not implement criteria that are sufficient to distinguish clusters representing species from other clusters. The success of morphological species delimitation results from the potential to focus on characters that are directly involved in the speciation process, whereas molecular studies usually rely on markers that are not directly involved in speciation. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.

摘要

我们比较了基于单基因座DNA序列界定物种的不同方法与使用二元多基因座数据的方法所得出的结果。作为案例研究,我们考察了克里特岛上陆地蜗牛属Xerocrassa的辐射演化情况。许多基于线粒体序列的方法导致物种数量被严重低估或高估。使用AFLP数据的方法所产生的分类结果与形态学分类的一致性平均而言高于基于线粒体序列的方法。然而,即便使用二元多基因座数据,正确的物种分类百分比依然很低。在本研究中应用的所有方法里,无论是单基因座序列还是二元多基因座数据,高斯聚类产生的分类结果与形态学分类的一致性最高。有两个普遍问题阻碍着物种界定,即稀有性和生物多样性的层次结构。利用遗传数据进行物种界定的方法寻找个体聚类,但并未采用足以将代表物种的聚类与其他聚类区分开来的标准。形态学物种界定的成功源于能够聚焦于直接参与物种形成过程的特征,而分子研究通常依赖于并非直接参与物种形成的标记。© 威利·亨尼希学会2011年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验