TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Intarcia Therapeutics, Hayward, CA, USA.
Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):89-95. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01584-3. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) injected periodically have been shown to not increase and, for some members of this class, decrease the risk of cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular safety of delivering a continuous subcutaneous infusion of the GLP-1RA exenatide (ITCA 650) is unknown. Here, we randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes with, or at risk for, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) to receive ITCA 650 or placebo to assess cardiovascular safety in a pre-approval trial ( NCT01455896 ). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or hospitalization for unstable angina. On the basis of 2008 guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, a non-inferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the hazard ratio (HR) was used. We randomized 4,156 patients (2,075 assigned to receive ITCA 650 and 2,081 assigned to receive placebo) who were followed for a median of 16 months. The primary outcome occurred in 4.6% (95/2,075) of patients in the ITCA 650 group and 3.8% (79/2,081) of patients in the placebo group, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority criterion (HR = 1.21, 95% CI, 0.90-1.63, P = 0.004). Serious adverse events were similar between the two groups. Adverse events were more frequent in the ITCA 650 group (72%, 1,491/2,074) than in the placebo group (63.9%, 1,325/2,070), mainly due to an increase in gastrointestinal events and disorders while on ITCA 650. In patients with type 2 diabetes with, or at risk for, ASCVD, ITCA 650 was non-inferior to placebo. A larger and longer-duration cardiovascular outcomes trial is needed to define more precisely the cardiovascular effects of ITCA 650 in this population.
定期注射胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已被证明不会增加,而且对于该类别的某些成员,还会降低心血管事件的风险。将 GLP-1RA 艾塞那肽(ITCA 650)持续皮下输注的心血管安全性尚不清楚。在这里,我们将患有 2 型糖尿病或有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的患者随机分配接受 ITCA 650 或安慰剂治疗,以在预批准试验中评估心血管安全性(NCT01455896)。主要结局是心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和不稳定型心绞痛住院的复合结局。根据美国食品和药物管理局 2008 年的指导原则,使用危险比(HR)的 95%置信区间(CI)上限的非劣效性边界为 1.8。我们随机分配了 4156 名患者(2075 名接受 ITCA 650 治疗,2081 名接受安慰剂治疗),中位随访时间为 16 个月。主要结局发生在 ITCA 650 组的 4.6%(95/2075)患者和安慰剂组的 3.8%(79/2081)患者中,符合预先指定的非劣效性标准(HR=1.21,95%CI,0.90-1.63,P=0.004)。两组严重不良事件相似。在 ITCA 650 组(72%,1491/2074)中,不良反应比安慰剂组(63.9%,1325/2070)更频繁,主要是由于在接受 ITCA 650 治疗时胃肠道事件和疾病增加。在患有 2 型糖尿病或有 ASCVD 风险的患者中,ITCA 650 与安慰剂相比无差异。需要更大和更长时间的心血管结局试验来更准确地确定 ITCA 650 在该人群中的心血管作用。