Carey Nicholas I, Hansroth Joseph, Davis Hanna, Dilcher Brian Z, Findley Scott W
Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 29;13(11):e19989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19989. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Rural rotations can be a valuable experience for emergency medicine (EM) residents. To date, there has not been a retrospective cohort study comparing procedures performed at urban versus rural emergency departments (EDs).
The purpose of this study was to compare procedures performed by EM residents in urban versus rural EDs, with the hypothesis that there will be no significant difference in the procedures performed.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing procedures performed by second- and third-year EM residents based on medical chart review. The procedures were counted at three locations in West Virginia, including a small rural ED, a large rural ED, and a tertiary care ED. Procedure notes were collected from September 2018 to September 2019. The final analysis included nine months, as three months did not have residents at all locations. Eight procedures were standardized based on the number of procedures performed per 100 hours worked by residents. A comparison of total procedures and complex versus simple procedures was performed. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to compare resident hours for procedures between each of the three locations. To compare each of the hospitals to one another separately, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed.
The total resident hours worked included 1,800 at the small rural ED, 13,725.5 at the tertiary care ED, and 5,319 at the large rural ED. A p-value of 0.0311 for the Kruskal-Wallis H Test indicated a difference between at least two of the ED sites. A statistically significant difference exists (p-value = 0.0135) between the urban ED (95% CI: 0.15-0.62) and the large rural ED (95% CI: 0.54-1.53). There was no significant difference in complex versus simple procedures among the three locations (p-value = 0.4159).
When compared with the tertiary care ED, residents performed more total procedures at the large rural ED and similar total procedure numbers at the small rural ED when standardized for hours worked. There was no significant difference when comparing complex and simple procedures among the three locations.
农村轮转对于急诊医学(EM)住院医师而言可能是一次宝贵的经历。迄今为止,尚无一项回顾性队列研究比较城市与农村急诊科(ED)所实施的操作。
本研究旨在比较城市与农村急诊科中急诊医学住院医师所实施的操作,假设所实施的操作不存在显著差异。
开展一项回顾性队列研究,通过病历审查比较二年级和三年级急诊医学住院医师所实施的操作。在西弗吉尼亚的三个地点统计操作情况,包括一家小型农村急诊科、一家大型农村急诊科和一家三级医疗急诊科。从2018年9月至2019年9月收集操作记录。最终分析涵盖九个月,因为有三个月并非所有地点都有住院医师。根据住院医师每工作100小时所实施的操作数量,对八项操作进行了标准化。对总操作数量以及复杂操作与简单操作进行了比较。进行了Kruskal-Wallis H检验,以比较三个地点中每个地点操作的住院医师工作时长。为了分别比较每家医院,进行了Mann-Whitney U检验。
住院医师的总工作时长为:小型农村急诊科1800小时,三级医疗急诊科13725.5小时,大型农村急诊科5319小时。Kruskal-Wallis H检验的p值为0.0311,表明至少两个急诊科地点之间存在差异。城市急诊科(95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.62)与大型农村急诊科(95%置信区间:0.54 - 1.53)之间存在统计学显著差异(p值 = 0.0135)。三个地点之间复杂操作与简单操作无显著差异(p值 = 0.4159)。
与三级医疗急诊科相比,标准化工作时长后,住院医师在大型农村急诊科实施的总操作更多,在小型农村急诊科实施的总操作数量相近。三个地点之间比较复杂操作和简单操作时无显著差异。