Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 7;11(1):23534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03024-1.
The aim of the study is to develop artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm based on a deep learning model to predict mortality using abbreviate injury score (AIS). The performance of the conventional anatomic injury severity score (ISS) system in predicting in-hospital mortality is still limited. AIS data of 42,933 patients registered in the Korean trauma data bank from four Korean regional trauma centers were enrolled. After excluding patients who were younger than 19 years old and those who died within six hours from arrival, we included 37,762 patients, of which 36,493 (96.6%) survived and 1269 (3.4%) deceased. To enhance the AI model performance, we reduced the AIS codes to 46 input values by organizing them according to the organ location (Region-46). The total AIS and six categories of the anatomic region in the ISS system (Region-6) were used to compare the input features. The AI models were compared with the conventional ISS and new ISS (NISS) systems. We evaluated the performance pertaining to the 12 combinations of the features and models. The highest accuracy (85.05%) corresponded to Region-46 with DNN, followed by that of Region-6 with DNN (83.62%), AIS with DNN (81.27%), ISS-16 (80.50%), NISS-16 (79.18%), NISS-25 (77.09%), and ISS-25 (70.82%). The highest AUROC (0.9084) corresponded to Region-46 with DNN, followed by that of Region-6 with DNN (0.9013), AIS with DNN (0.8819), ISS (0.8709), and NISS (0.8681). The proposed deep learning scheme with feature combination exhibited high accuracy metrics such as the balanced accuracy and AUROC than the conventional ISS and NISS systems. We expect that our trial would be a cornerstone of more complex combination model.
本研究旨在开发基于深度学习模型的人工智能 (AI) 算法,使用简明损伤评分 (AIS) 预测死亡率。传统解剖损伤严重程度评分 (ISS) 系统在预测院内死亡率方面的性能仍然有限。纳入了来自韩国四个地区创伤中心的韩国创伤数据库中 42933 名患者的 AIS 数据。排除年龄小于 19 岁和入院后 6 小时内死亡的患者后,共纳入 37762 名患者,其中 36493 名(96.6%)存活,1269 名(3.4%)死亡。为了提高 AI 模型的性能,我们通过按照器官位置(Region-46)对 AIS 编码进行分组,将其减少到 46 个输入值。ISS 系统的总 AIS 和六个解剖区域类别(Region-6)被用于比较输入特征。比较了 AI 模型与传统的 ISS 和新 ISS(NISS)系统。我们评估了与特征和模型的 12 种组合相关的性能。最高的准确性(85.05%)对应于 DNN 的 Region-46,其次是 DNN 的 Region-6(83.62%)、DNN 的 AIS(81.27%)、ISS-16(80.50%)、NISS-16(79.18%)、NISS-25(77.09%)和 ISS-25(70.82%)。最高的 AUROC(0.9084)对应于 DNN 的 Region-46,其次是 DNN 的 Region-6(0.9013)、DNN 的 AIS(0.8819)、ISS(0.8709)和 NISS(0.8681)。与传统的 ISS 和 NISS 系统相比,具有特征组合的深度学习方案表现出更高的准确性指标,如平衡准确性和 AUROC。我们希望我们的试验将成为更复杂的组合模型的基石。