• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国西部的宗教、社会交往与新冠疫情发病率

Religion, social interactions, and COVID-19 incidence in Western Germany.

作者信息

Laliotis Ioannis, Minos Dimitrios

机构信息

University of Peloponnese, Department of Economics, Greece.

City University of London, Department of Economics, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur Econ Rev. 2022 Jan;141:103992. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103992. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103992
PMID:34876706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8641103/
Abstract

This paper investigates how social interactions, as shaped by religious denomination, are related to COVID-19 incidence and associated mortality in Western Germany. We observe that the number of infections and deaths during the early pandemic phase were much higher in predominantly Catholic counties with arguably stronger family and social ties. The relationship was confirmed at the county level through numerous robustness checks, and after controlling for a series of characteristics and county fixed effects. At the individual level, we confirmed that Catholics, relative to non-Catholics, have tighter and more frequent interactions with their family and friends. Moreover, the intensity of social interaction was able to partially explain the relationship between COVID-19 incidence and share of Catholics at the county level. Our results highlight the number of dimensions that have to be taken into account when designing and implementing mitigation measures in the early stages of disease outbreaks.

摘要

本文研究了由宗教派别塑造的社会互动如何与德国西部的新冠疫情发病率及相关死亡率相关联。我们观察到,在疫情初期,家庭和社会关系可能更为紧密的主要为天主教徒的县,感染和死亡人数要高得多。通过大量稳健性检验,并在控制了一系列特征和县级固定效应后,这种关系在县级层面得到了证实。在个体层面,我们证实,相对于非天主教徒,天主教徒与家人和朋友的互动更为紧密和频繁。此外,社会互动的强度能够部分解释县级层面新冠疫情发病率与天主教徒比例之间的关系。我们的研究结果凸显了在疾病爆发初期设计和实施缓解措施时必须考虑的多个维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/8dfc572d0e01/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/9dccfaa4fe3b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/e9b67defe408/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/7a096b0fb3ac/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/e3cfbb78a0e5/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/8dfc572d0e01/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/9dccfaa4fe3b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/e9b67defe408/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/7a096b0fb3ac/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/e3cfbb78a0e5/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a5/8641103/8dfc572d0e01/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Religion, social interactions, and COVID-19 incidence in Western Germany.德国西部的宗教、社会交往与新冠疫情发病率
Eur Econ Rev. 2022 Jan;141:103992. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103992. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
Family size and religious denomination in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰的家庭规模与宗教派别。
J Biosoc Sci. 1985 Apr;17(2):137-45. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000015595.
3
Is investing in religious institutions a viable pathway to reduce mortality in the population?投资宗教机构是否是降低人口死亡率的可行途径?
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113106. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Body Mass Index in Religious Contexts: Exploring the Multilevel Influences of Religion.宗教背景下的体重指数:探究宗教的多层次影响。
J Relig Health. 2021 Apr;60(2):1160-1178. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00844-4.
5
Catholic attitudes toward abortion.天主教对堕胎的态度。
Conscience. 1984 Jul-Aug;5(4):6-7, 10.
6
Dungaw: Re-imagined Religious Expression in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.达岗:新冠疫情背景下的宗教表达新形式。
J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2285-2305. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01266-x. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Religious pro-sociality? Experimental evidence from a sample of 766 Spaniards.宗教亲社会性?来自766名西班牙人的样本的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104685. eCollection 2014.
8
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
9
Social disparities in the first wave of COVID-19 incidence rates in Germany: a county-scale explainable machine learning approach.德国 COVID-19 发病率第一波的社会差异:基于县级的可解释机器学习方法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e049852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049852.
10
[Analysis of fertility levels in selected territories of Poland in 1931].[1931年波兰部分地区生育水平分析]
Studia Demogr. 1991(106):65-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Relation between Contextual Social Determinants of Health and COVID-19 Occurrence and Hospitalization.探索健康的背景性社会决定因素与新冠病毒肺炎发生及住院之间的关系。
Informatics (MDPI). 2024 Mar;11(1). doi: 10.3390/informatics11010004. Epub 2024 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Asocial capital: Civic culture and social distancing during COVID-19.社会资本缺失:新冠疫情期间的公民文化与社交距离
J Public Econ. 2021 Feb;194:104342. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104342. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Social capital and the spread of covid-19: Insights from european countries.社会资本与新冠病毒传播:来自欧洲国家的见解。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102531. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102531. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Coronagraben in Switzerland: culture and social distancing in times of COVID-19.瑞士的科罗讷格拉本:新冠疫情期间的文化与社交距离
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(4):1355-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00865-y. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Stay-at-home orders, social distancing, and trust.居家令、社交距离和信任。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(4):1321-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00848-z. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
5
Bowling together by bowling alone: Social capital and COVID-19.一起打保龄,还是独自打保龄:社会资本与新冠疫情。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113501. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113501. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间对公共卫生政策的信任与遵守
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104316. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
The pandemic predominantly hits poor neighbourhoods? SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 fatalities in German districts.大流行主要袭击贫困社区吗?德国各地区的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 死亡。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1176-1180. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa168.
8
Excess mortality during the Covid-19 pandemic: Early evidence from England and Wales.新冠大流行期间的超额死亡率:来自英格兰和威尔士的早期证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113101. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113101. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
The Predictive Capacity of Air Travel Patterns During the Global Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Risk, Uncertainty and Randomness.《新冠大流行期间全球传播期间航空旅行模式的预测能力:风险、不确定性和随机性》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103356.
10
SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading in France in late December 2019.SARS-CoV-2 已于 2019 年 12 月在法国传播。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jun;55(6):106006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106006. Epub 2020 May 3.