Jamjoom Ammer M, Gahtani Abdulhadi Y, Jamjoom Abdulhakim B
Neurological Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, GBR.
Neurological Surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19229. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19229. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Clinical trials are at the top of research study designs and tend to attract high citation numbers. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a multidisciplinary disease that continues to be the subject of peak research interest. In general, the literature relating to the predictors of citation rates in clinical trials remains limited. This review aims to identify the factors that influence citation numbers in high-impact GBM clinical trials. The 100 most cited GBM trials of any phase published from 1975 to 2019 were selected and reviewed. The primary analysis correlated citation numbers of articles with various trial and publication-related predictors using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The secondary analysis compared the mean citation numbers for different subgroups using the mean difference test. The median (range) citation number for the selected 100 trials was 349 (135-16,384). The primary analysis showed a significant correlation between citation numbers of articles and the study population (P = 0.024), trial phase (I-III) (P = 0.0427), and the impact factor (IF) of the journal (P < 0.0001). The secondary analysis demonstrated significantly higher mean citation numbers in all trials with the following features: study population ≥115 (P = 0.0208), phase III (P = 0.0372), treatment protocol including radiotherapy (P = 0.0189), temozolomide (TMZ) therapy (P = 0.0343), IF of the journal ≥14.9 (P = 0.02), and general medical journals (P = 0.28). We conclude that the most significant predictors of citation rates in high-impact GBM trials were the study population, trial phase, and journal's IF. The treatment protocol was a positive predictor when it included the currently widely accepted treatment modalities (radiotherapy and TZM). Randomization, age of publication, as well as the numbers of arms, authors, centers, countries, and references were not significant predictors. Increasing awareness of the factors that could affect citations may help researchers undertaking clinical trials to enhance the academic impact of their work.
临床试验位于研究设计的顶端,往往会吸引较高的引用次数。多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种多学科疾病,一直是研究热点的主题。总体而言,关于临床试验中引用率预测因素的文献仍然有限。本综述旨在确定影响高影响力GBM临床试验引用次数的因素。我们选择并回顾了1975年至2019年发表的任何阶段被引用次数最多的100项GBM试验。主要分析使用Pearson相关系数将文章的引用次数与各种试验及出版相关的预测因素进行关联。次要分析使用均值差异检验比较不同亚组的平均引用次数。所选100项试验的中位(范围)引用次数为349(135 - 16384)。主要分析表明文章的引用次数与研究人群(P = 0.024)、试验阶段(I - III)(P = 0.0427)以及期刊的影响因子(IF)(P < 0.0001)之间存在显著相关性。次要分析表明,具有以下特征的所有试验的平均引用次数显著更高:研究人群≥115(P = 0.0208)、III期(P = 0.0372)、包括放疗的治疗方案(P = 0.0189)、替莫唑胺(TMZ)治疗(P = 0.0343)、期刊的IF≥14.9(P = 0.02)以及综合医学期刊(P = 0.28)。我们得出结论,高影响力GBM试验中引用率的最重要预测因素是研究人群、试验阶段和期刊的IF。当治疗方案包括目前广泛接受的治疗方式(放疗和TZM)时,它是一个积极的预测因素。随机化、发表年份、以及臂数、作者、中心、国家和参考文献数量不是显著的预测因素。提高对可能影响引用的因素的认识可能有助于进行临床试验的研究人员提高其工作的学术影响力。