• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎的唾液检测:用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的口腔海绵采样的临床性能

Salivary detection of COVID-19: clinical performance of oral sponge sampling for SARS-CoV-2 testing.

作者信息

Boutros Jacques, Benzaquen Jonathan, Marquette Charles Hugo, Ilié Marius, Labaky Mickelina, Benchetrit Didier, Lavrut Thibaut, Leroy Sylvie, Chemla Richard, Carles Michel, Tanga Virginie, Maniel Charlotte, Bordone Olivier, Allégra Maryline, Lespinet Virginie, Fayada Julien, Griffonnet Jennifer, Hofman Véronique, Hofman Paul

机构信息

Dept of Pulmonary Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, FHU OncoAge, Nice, France.

Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice, France.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2021 Dec 6;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00396-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.

DOI:10.1183/23120541.00396-2021
PMID:34877351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8474486/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current diagnostic standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing with nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. The invasiveness and need for trained personnel make the NP technique unsuited for repeated community-based mass screening. We developed a technique to collect saliva in a simple and easy way with the sponges that are usually used for tamponade of epistaxis. This study was carried out to validate the clinical performance of oral sponge (OS) sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing.

METHODS

Over a period of 22 weeks, we collected prospectively 409 paired NP and OS samples from consecutive subjects presenting to a public community-based free screening centre. Subjects were referred by their attending physician because of recent COVID-19 symptoms (n = 147) or by the contact tracing staff of the French public health insurance because they were considered as close contacts of a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 case (n = 262).

RESULTS

In symptomatic subjects, RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing with OS showed a 96.5% (95% CI: 89.6-94.8) concordance with NP testing, and a 93.2% (95% CI: 89.1-97.3) sensitivity when using the IdyllaTM platform and a sensitivity of 76.3% (95% CI: 69.4-83.2) on the Synlab Barla laboratory platform. In close contacts the NP-OS concordance (93.8%, 95% CI: 90.9-96.7) and OS sensitivity (71.9%, 95% CI: 66.5-77.3) were slightly lower.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly suggest that OS testing is a straightforward, low-cost and high-throughput sampling method that can be used for frequent RT-PCR testing of COVID-19 patients and mass screening of populations.

摘要

背景

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)目前的诊断标准是使用鼻咽拭子进行逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测。鼻咽拭子技术具有侵入性且需要专业人员操作,因此不适合用于基于社区的重复大规模筛查。我们开发了一种技术,使用通常用于鼻出血填塞的海绵以简单便捷的方式收集唾液。本研究旨在验证口腔海绵(OS)采样用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的临床性能。

方法

在22周的时间里,我们前瞻性地从一家基于社区的免费公共筛查中心的连续就诊者中收集了409对鼻咽拭子和口腔海绵样本。受试者因近期出现COVID-19症状(n = 147)由主治医生转诊,或因被法国公共医疗保险的接触者追踪工作人员认定为实验室确诊COVID-19病例的密切接触者(n = 262)而转诊。

结果

在有症状的受试者中,使用口腔海绵进行RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2检测与鼻咽拭子检测的一致性为96.5%(95%可信区间:89.6 - 94.8),使用IdyllaTM平台时敏感性为93.2%(95%可信区间:89.1 - 97.3),在Synlab Barla实验室平台上敏感性为76.3%(95%可信区间:69.4 - 83.2)。在密切接触者中,鼻咽拭子与口腔海绵的一致性(93.8%,95%可信区间:90.9 - 96.7)和口腔海绵的敏感性(71.9%,95%可信区间:66.5 - 77.3)略低。

结论

这些结果有力地表明,口腔海绵检测是一种简单、低成本且高通量的采样方法,可用于对COVID-19患者进行频繁的RT-PCR检测和人群大规模筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/e7fb21ddb863/00396-2021.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1cfe76bfd405/00396-2021.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1976f4909c3c/00396-2021.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1082a96fe8d2/00396-2021.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/e7fb21ddb863/00396-2021.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1cfe76bfd405/00396-2021.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1976f4909c3c/00396-2021.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/1082a96fe8d2/00396-2021.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/8646006/e7fb21ddb863/00396-2021.04.jpg

相似文献

1
Salivary detection of COVID-19: clinical performance of oral sponge sampling for SARS-CoV-2 testing.新型冠状病毒肺炎的唾液检测:用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的口腔海绵采样的临床性能
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Dec 6;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00396-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.秘鲁唾液 RT-PCR 和鼻咽拭子抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性能评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0086122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00861-22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
4
Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.使用或不使用混合 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的唾液作为检测样本。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0243183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243183. eCollection 2021.
5
Surveillance testing using salivary RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in managed quarantine facilities in Australia: A laboratory validation and implementation study.澳大利亚管理隔离设施中使用唾液逆转录聚合酶链反应检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的监测测试:一项实验室验证与实施研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Sep;26:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100533. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Performance of RT-PCR on Saliva Specimens Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children: A Prospective Comparative Clinical Trial.唾液标本与鼻咽拭子的 RT-PCR 检测在儿童 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的比较:一项前瞻性的临床比较试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Aug 1;40(8):e300-e304. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003198.
7
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.比较基于 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 的唾液或鼻咽拭子标本在无症状人群中的检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0006221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00062-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
Saliva for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in school-age children.唾液用于检测学龄儿童中 SARS-CoV-2 的分子。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1330-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
10
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 screening tests: a national prospective analysis.新型冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)非侵入性筛查试验的诊断准确性:一项全国性前瞻性分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 21;25(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11088-x.
2
Predicting the hub interactome of COVID-19 and oral squamous cell carcinoma: uncovering ALDH-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation via salivary inflammatory proteins.预测新冠病毒病与口腔鳞状细胞癌的核心相互作用组:通过唾液炎症蛋白揭示醛脱氢酶介导的Wnt/β-连环蛋白信号通路激活
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):4068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88819-2.
3
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

本文引用的文献

1
A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy.一种用于疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎的即时快速逆转录聚合酶链反应检测:诊断准确性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jun;9(11):921. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-690.
2
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.RT-PCR 法筛查 SARS-CoV-2:唾液还是鼻咽拭子?快速综述和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021.
3
Performance of Oropharyngeal Swab Testing Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019-United States, January 2020-February 2020.
样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
4
Evaluation of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab sampling for genomic detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children accessing a pediatric emergency department during the second pandemic wave.在第二波疫情期间,对前往儿科急诊科的儿童进行唾液和鼻咽拭子采样以检测SARS-CoV-2基因组的评估。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1163438. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1163438. eCollection 2023.
5
An evaluation index system for regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity in China: a modified Delphi consensus study.中国区域移动 SARS-CoV-2 病毒核酸检测能力评价指标体系:一项改良 Delphi 共识研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08446-9.
6
Setting-Up a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Genome Assessment by Next-Generation Sequencing in an Academic Hospital Center (LPCE, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France).在学术医院中心(法国尼斯巴斯德医院LPCE)通过下一代测序建立快速的SARS-CoV-2基因组评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 11;8:730577. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.730577. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluation of Sample Pooling for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Saliva Samples with the Idylla SARS-CoV-2 Test.评估基于 Idylla SARS-CoV-2 检测的鼻咽拭子和唾液样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的样本混合检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0099621. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00996-21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2020 年 1 月至 2 月美国对新型冠状病毒疾病的口咽拭子检测与鼻咽拭子检测的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 1;72(3):482-485. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa759.
4
SalivaDirect: A simplified and flexible platform to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity.唾液直接检测:一个简化且灵活的平台,可提高 SARS-CoV-2 检测能力。
Med. 2021 Mar 12;2(3):263-280.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.12.010. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
5
Self-Collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients.自我采集盐水漱口样本作为替代,用于门诊患者的 COVID-19 诊断,替代医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02427-20.
6
Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较唾液和鼻咽拭子核酸扩增检测在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):353-360. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876.
7
False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review.COVID-19 初始 RT-PCR 检测的假阴性结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242958. eCollection 2020.
8
Pooled Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的 pooled saliva specimens。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02486-20.
9
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.从唾液中检测 SARS-CoV-2 与门诊鼻咽拭子比较。
Viruses. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/v12111314.
10
Establishment of a Collection of Blood-Derived Products from COVID-19 Patients for Translational Research: Experience of the LPCE Biobank (Nice, France).建立用于转化研究的COVID-19患者血液衍生产品库:LPCE生物样本库(法国尼斯)的经验
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Dec;18(6):517-524. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0055. Epub 2020 Nov 10.