Maves Ryan C, Richard Stephanie A, Lindholm David A, Epsi Nusrat, Larson Derek T, Conlon Christian, Everson Kyle, Lis Steffen, Blair Paul W, Chi Sharon, Ganesan Anuradha, Pollett Simon, Burgess Timothy H, Agan Brian K, Colombo Rhonda E, Colombo Christopher J
Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 10;8(12):ofab421. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab421. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Early recognition of high-risk patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may improve outcomes. Although many predictive scoring systems exist, their complexity may limit utility in COVID-19. We assessed the prognostic performance of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and an age-based modification (NEWS+age) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter US Military Health System (MHS) observational cohort study.
Hospitalized adults with confirmed COVID-19 not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation at admission and with a baseline NEWS were included. We analyzed each scoring system's ability to predict key clinical outcomes, including progression to invasive ventilation or death, stratified by baseline severity (low [0-3], medium [4-6], and high [≥7]).
Among 184 included participants, those with low baseline NEWS had significantly shorter hospitalizations ( < .01) and lower maximum illness severity ( < .001). Most (80.2%) of low NEWS vs 15.8% of high NEWS participants required no or at most low-flow oxygen supplementation. Low NEWS (≤3) had a negative predictive value of 97.2% for progression to invasive ventilation or death; a high NEWS (≥7) had high specificity (93.1%) but low positive predictive value (42.1%) for such progression. NEWS+age performed similarly to NEWS at predicting invasive ventilation or death (NEWS+age: area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.73; NEWS: AUROC, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.75).
NEWS and NEWS+age showed similar test characteristics in an MHS COVID-19 cohort. Notably, low baseline scores had an excellent negative predictive value. Given their easy applicability, these scoring systems may be useful in resource-limited settings to identify COVID-19 patients who are unlikely to progress to critical illness.
早期识别2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)高危患者可能改善预后。尽管存在许多预测评分系统,但其复杂性可能限制其在COVID-19中的应用。我们在美国军事卫生系统(MHS)一项前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究中,评估了住院COVID-19患者的国家早期预警评分(NEWS)和基于年龄的改良评分(NEWS+年龄)的预后性能。
纳入入院时确诊为COVID-19且不需要有创机械通气且有基线NEWS的住院成人。我们分析了每个评分系统预测关键临床结局的能力,包括进展为有创通气或死亡,并按基线严重程度分层(低[0-3]、中[4-6]和高[≥7])。
在184名纳入的参与者中,基线NEWS低的患者住院时间显著缩短(<0.01),最大疾病严重程度较低(<0.001)。大多数基线NEWS低的参与者(80.2%)与15.8%的基线NEWS高的参与者不需要或最多只需要低流量吸氧。NEWS低(≤3)对于进展为有创通气或死亡的阴性预测值为97.2%;NEWS高(≥7)对于这种进展具有高特异性(93.1%)但低阳性预测值(42.1%)。在预测有创通气或死亡方面,NEWS+年龄的表现与NEWS相似(NEWS+年龄:受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUROC],0.69;95%CI,0.65-0.73;NEWS:AUROC,0.70;95%CI,0.66-0.75)。
在MHS的COVID-19队列中,NEWS和NEWS+年龄显示出相似的测试特征。值得注意的是,低基线评分具有出色的阴性预测值。鉴于其易于应用,这些评分系统可能在资源有限的环境中用于识别不太可能进展为危重症的COVID-19患者。