Suppr超能文献

急诊科启动的丁丙诺啡治疗方案:一项全国性评估。

Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine protocols: A national evaluation.

作者信息

Guo Clara Z, D'Onofrio Gail, Fiellin David A, Edelman E Jennifer, Hawk Kathryn, Herring Andrew, McCormack Ryan, Perrone Jeanmarie, Cowan Ethan

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Nov 29;2(6):e12606. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12606. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (BUP) for opioid use disorder is an evidence-based practice, but limited data exist on BUP initiation practices in real-world settings. We sought to characterize protocols for BUP initiation among a geographically diverse sample of emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

In December 2020, we reviewed prestudy clinical BUP initiation protocols from all EDs participating in CTN0099 Emergency Department-INitiated bupreNOrphine VAlidaTION (ED-INNOVATION). We abstracted information on processes for identification of treatment-eligible patients, BUP administration, and discharge care.

RESULTS

All participating ED-INNOVATION sites across 22 states submitted protocols; 31 protocols were analyzed. : Most EDs 22 (71%) relied on clinician judgment to determine appropriateness of BUP treatment with only 7 (23%) requiring decision support tools or diagnosis checklists. Before BUP initiation, 27 (87%) protocols required a documented Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score; 4 (13%) required a clinical diagnosis of withdrawal with optional COWS score. Twenty-seven (87%) recommended a minimum COWS score of 8 for ED-initiated BUP. : Initial BUP dose ranged from 2-16 mg (mode = 4). For continued withdrawal symptoms, 27 (87%) protocols recommended an interval of 30-60 minutes between first and second BUP dose. Total BUP dose in the ED ranged from 8 to 32 mg. : Twenty-eight (90%) protocols recommended a BUP prescription (mode 16 mg daily) at discharge. Naloxone prescription and/or provision was suggested in 23 (74%) protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

In this geographically diverse sample of EDs, protocols for ED-initiated BUP differed between sites. Future work should evaluate the association between this variation and patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

急诊科启动丁丙诺啡(BUP)治疗阿片类药物使用障碍是一种循证实践,但关于现实环境中丁丙诺啡启动实践的数据有限。我们试图描述不同地理位置的急诊科(ED)中丁丙诺啡启动方案的特征。

方法

2020年12月,我们审查了参与CTN0099急诊科启动丁丙诺啡验证(ED-INNOVATION)研究的所有急诊科的研究前临床丁丙诺啡启动方案。我们提取了关于确定符合治疗条件患者的流程、丁丙诺啡给药和出院护理的信息。

结果

来自22个州的所有参与ED-INNOVATION研究的地点都提交了方案;共分析了31个方案。大多数急诊科(22个,占71%)依靠临床医生的判断来确定丁丙诺啡治疗的适用性,只有7个(占23%)需要决策支持工具或诊断清单。在启动丁丙诺啡之前,27个(占87%)方案要求有记录的临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)评分;4个(占13%)要求有戒断的临床诊断以及可选的COWS评分。27个(占87%)方案建议急诊科启动丁丙诺啡时的COWS最低评分为8分。初始丁丙诺啡剂量范围为2 - 16毫克(众数 = 4毫克)。对于持续的戒断症状,27个(占87%)方案建议在首次和第二次丁丙诺啡剂量之间间隔30 - 60分钟。急诊科的丁丙诺啡总剂量范围为8至32毫克。28个(占90%)方案建议出院时开具丁丙诺啡处方(众数为每日16毫克)。23个(占74%)方案建议开具纳洛酮处方和/或提供纳洛酮。

结论

在这个地理位置多样的急诊科样本中,各地点之间急诊科启动丁丙诺啡的方案存在差异。未来的工作应评估这种差异与患者结局之间的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3930/8630357/bedc250e465b/EMP2-2-e12606-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验