Zhang Jinlong, Hwang Doyeon, Yang Seokhun, Kim Chee Hae, Lee Joo Myung, Nam Chang-Wook, Shin Eun-Seok, Doh Joon-Hyung, Hoshino Masahiro, Hamaya Rikuta, Kanaji Yoshihisa, Murai Tadashi, Zhang Jun-Jie, Ye Fei, Li Xiaobo, Ge Zhen, Chen Shao-Liang, Kakuta Tsunekazu, Koo Bon-Kwon
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2022 Jan;52(1):47-59. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0128. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
The influence of pre-intervention coronary physiologic status on outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well known. We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) combined with post-PCI FFR.
A total of 1,479 PCI patients with pre-and post-PCI FFR data were analyzed. The patients were classified according to the median values of pre-PCI FFR (0.71) and post-PCI FFR (0.88). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years.
The risk of TVF was higher in the low pre-PCI FFR group than in the high pre-PCI FFR group (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.87; p=0.011). In 4 group comparisons, the cumulative incidences of TVF at 2 years were 3.8%, 4.1%, 4.8%, and 10.2% in the high pre-/high post-, low pre-/high post-, high pre-/low post-, and low pre-/low post-PCI FFR groups, respectively. The risk of TVF was the highest in the low pre-/low post-PCI FFR group among the groups (p values for comparisons <0.05). In addition, the high pre-/low post-PCI FFR group presented a comparable risk of TVF with the high post-PCI FFR groups (p values for comparison >0.05). When the prognostic value of the post-PCI FFR was evaluated according to the pre-PCI FFR, the risk of TVF significantly decreased with an increase in post-PCI FFR in the low pre-PCI FFR group, but not in the high pre-PCI FFR group.
Pre-PCI FFR was associated with clinical outcomes after PCI, and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR differed according to the pre-PCI FFR.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012281.
干预前冠状动脉生理状态对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后结局的影响尚不清楚。我们试图研究PCI术前血流储备分数(FFR)与PCI术后FFR联合应用的预后意义。
对1479例有PCI术前和术后FFR数据的PCI患者进行分析。根据PCI术前FFR(0.71)和PCI术后FFR(0.88)的中位数对患者进行分类。主要结局是2年时的靶血管失败(TVF)。
PCI术前FFR低的组TVF风险高于PCI术前FFR高的组(风险比,1.82;95%置信区间,1.15 - 2.87;p = 0.011)。在4组比较中,PCI术前/术后FFR高、低/高、高/低和低/低组2年时TVF的累积发生率分别为3.8%、4.1%、4.8%和10.2%。在这些组中,PCI术前/术后FFR低的组TVF风险最高(比较的p值<0.05)。此外,PCI术前/术后FFR高/低组与PCI术后FFR高的组TVF风险相当(比较的p值>0.05)。根据PCI术前FFR评估PCI术后FFR的预后价值时,PCI术前FFR低的组中,TVF风险随PCI术后FFR升高而显著降低,但在PCI术前FFR高的组中并非如此。
PCI术前FFR与PCI术后临床结局相关,且PCI术后FFR的预后价值因PCI术前FFR而异。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04012281。