Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Bauru School of Dentistry, Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Bauru School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontic and Public Health, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Dec 6;35:e121. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0121. eCollection 2021.
This randomized three-armed controlled clinical trial compared the effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) and sodium fluoride (NaF) varnishes on caries control in smooth surfaces of permanent dentition and children's acceptability. Sixty children (6-8 y/o) were randomly divided into TiF4 (2.45% F-), NaF (2.26% F-) or placebo (control) groups. Varnishes were applied on permanent teeth once a week for the first 4 weeks and after the 6th and 12th months of the study. The variables were as follows: International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scores, quantitative fluorescence changes, visual plaque index (VPI) and degree of acceptability. Two-way RM-ANOVA, ANOVA/Tukey and χ2 tests were performed (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the treatments with respect to ICDAS scores (p = 0.32). Only TiF4 reduced the mean fluorescence loss significantly at 18 months compared to the baseline (p = 0.003). TiF4 showed a lower percentage of new caries lesions by tooth surface than the placebo, while NaF did not induce such a change (p < 0.014). Regardless of the treatment, more than 95% of the participants reported being satisfied. For all groups, the VPI decreased significantly at 3 months compared to the baseline value (p < 0.001), with no differences between the treatments (p = 0.17). TiF4 had a similar ability to control caries lesions as NaF; however, only TiF4 differed from the placebo (p = 0.004). The acceptability of TiF4 varnish was similar to that of NaF varnish.
这项随机三臂对照临床试验比较了四氟化钛(TiF4)和氟化钠(NaF)涂料在恒磨牙平滑面龋齿控制方面的效果及其在儿童中的可接受性。将 60 名儿童(6-8 岁)随机分为 TiF4(2.45% F-)、NaF(2.26% F-)或安慰剂(对照组)组。涂料每周涂于恒磨牙一次,前 4 周为一个疗程,研究第 6 个月和第 12 个月时各再涂一个疗程。观察指标为国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)评分、定量荧光变化、视诊菌斑指数(VPI)和可接受性程度。采用双向 RM-ANOVA、ANOVA/Tukey 和 χ2 检验(p < 0.05)。三组治疗在 ICDAS 评分方面无差异(p = 0.32)。与基线相比,只有 TiF4 在 18 个月时能显著减少平均荧光损失(p = 0.003)。TiF4 比安慰剂组每牙面的新发龋损率更低,而 NaF 则没有引起这种变化(p < 0.014)。无论治疗组如何,超过 95%的参与者表示满意。所有组在 3 个月时的 VPI 与基线值相比均显著降低(p < 0.001),但三组之间无差异(p = 0.17)。TiF4 控制龋损的能力与 NaF 相似,但只有 TiF4 与安慰剂有差异(p = 0.004)。TiF4 涂料的可接受性与 NaF 涂料相似。