• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约市脆弱人群前往公共卫生应急配药点的步行距离。

Walking distance for vulnerable populations to public health emergency response points of dispensing in New York City.

机构信息

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5321-6521.

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Emerg Manag. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):519-529. doi: 10.5055/jem.0574.

DOI:10.5055/jem.0574
PMID:34878162
Abstract

During certain public health emergencies, points of dispensing (PODs) may be used to rapidly distribute medical countermeasures such as antibiotics to the general public to prevent disease. Jurisdictions across the country have identified sites for PODs in preparation for such an emergency; in New York City (NYC), the sites are identified based largely on population density. Vulnerable populations, defined for this analysis as persons with income below the federal poverty level, persons with less than a high school diploma, foreign-born persons, persons of color, persons aged ≥65 years, physically disabled persons, and unemployed persons, often experience a wide range of health inequities. In NYC, these populations are often concentrated in certain geographic areas and rely heavily on public transportation. Because public transportation will almost certainly be affected during large-scale public health emergencies that would require the rapid mass dispensing of medical countermeasures, we evaluated walking distances to PODs. We used an ordinary least squares (OLS) model and a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to determine if certain characteristics that increase health inequities in the population are associated with longer distances to the nearest POD relative to the general NYC population. Our OLS model identified shorter walking distances to PODs in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of persons with income below the federal poverty level, higher percentage of foreign-born persons, or higher percentage of persons of color, and identified longer walking distances to PODs in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of persons with less than a high school diploma. Our GWR model confirmed the findings from the OLS model and further illustrated these patterns by certain neighborhoods. Our analysis shows that currently identified locations for PODs in NYC are generally serving vulnerable populations equitably-particularly those defined by race or income status-at least in terms of walking distance.

摘要

在某些公共卫生紧急情况下,配给点(POD)可用于向公众快速分发抗生素等医疗对策,以预防疾病。全国各地区都已确定了 POD 地点,以应对此类紧急情况;在纽约市(NYC),这些地点主要是根据人口密度确定的。弱势群体在本分析中定义为收入低于联邦贫困线的人、未完成高中学业的人、外国出生的人、有色人种、年龄≥65 岁的人、身体残疾人和失业者,他们经常经历广泛的健康不平等。在纽约市,这些人群通常集中在某些地理区域,并且严重依赖公共交通工具。由于在需要大规模分发医疗对策的大规模公共卫生紧急情况下,公共交通几乎肯定会受到影响,因此我们评估了到 POD 的步行距离。我们使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)模型和地理加权回归(GWR)模型来确定是否某些增加人口健康不平等的特征与相对于纽约市一般人群到最近 POD 的距离较长有关。我们的 OLS 模型确定,在收入低于联邦贫困线的人比例较高、外国出生的人比例较高或有色人种比例较高的社区,到 POD 的步行距离较短,而在完成高中学业的人比例较高的社区,到 POD 的步行距离较长。我们的 GWR 模型证实了 OLS 模型的发现,并通过某些社区进一步说明了这些模式。我们的分析表明,纽约市目前确定的 POD 地点通常在服务弱势群体方面是公平的,尤其是在种族或收入状况方面,至少在步行距离方面是公平的。

相似文献

1
Walking distance for vulnerable populations to public health emergency response points of dispensing in New York City.纽约市脆弱人群前往公共卫生应急配药点的步行距离。
J Emerg Manag. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):519-529. doi: 10.5055/jem.0574.
2
Accessibility of cooling centers to heat-vulnerable populations in New York State.纽约州冷却中心对易受热人群的可达性。
J Transp Health. 2019 Sep;14. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.002.
3
Protecting the Public from H1N1 through Points of Dispensing (PODs).通过分发点(PODs)保护公众免受甲型H1N1流感侵害。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Mar;9(1):13-21. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0049. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
A Survey of Location-Allocation of Points of Dispensing During Public Health Emergencies.突发公共卫生事件中配给点选址-分配调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;10:811858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.811858. eCollection 2022.
5
In-Home Strategic National Stockpile Dispensing by Means of Home Health Agencies: An Alternative Means of Dispensing to Vulnerable Populations.家庭健康机构的家庭战略国家储备药品配发:向弱势群体配发药品的另一种方式。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Dec;14(6):725-732. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.124. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Approaches, Successes, and Challenges in Recruiting Closed Points of Dispensing Sites: A Qualitative Study.招募配药点封闭点的方法、成功经验与挑战:一项定性研究
Health Secur. 2021 May-Jun;19(3):327-337. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0219. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Uncertainty and operational considerations in mass prophylaxis workforce planning.大规模预防措施劳动力规划中的不确定性和操作考虑因素。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S121-31. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be9c39.
8
Alcohol-related emergency department visits and income inequality in New York City, USA: an ecological study.美国纽约市与酒精相关的急诊科就诊与收入不平等:一项生态学研究。
Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019041. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019041. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
9
A national study examining closed points of dispensing (PODs): existence, preparedness, exercise participation, and training provided.一项关于检查配药点(PODs)封闭情况的全国性研究:配药点的存在情况、准备情况、参与演练情况以及所提供的培训。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Jul-Aug;12(4):208-16. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0014. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
10
Current State of Mass Vaccination Preparedness and Operational Challenges in the United States, 2018-2019.2018-2019 年美国大规模疫苗接种准备现状和运营挑战。
Health Secur. 2020 Dec;18(6):473-482. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0146. Epub 2020 Oct 2.