Department of Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
School of Social Transformation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Jun;69(3-4):343-354. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12569. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
The decennial Census survey marks the emergence of federal classifications of race and ethnicity by which the U.S. government has historically conflated Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPI, hereafter) as "Asian or Pacific Islander." This conflation amplifies health injustices and inequities of NHPIs through multiple mechanisms because it masks the complex and heterogeneous experiences of NHPIs, whose positions and relations with the settler state are qualitatively and substantially distinct from Asian Americans. This critical review examines federal documents and research to examine how the panethnic categorizations are often sustained through scientific inquiry and methodologies. We found that self-determination and self-identification for NHPIs are impeded by settler-colonial relations between U.S. colonization of parts of Oceania (e.g., Hawai'i, Sāmoa, Fiji, and Guam) and the forcefully imposed categorization that continues to be in use to legitimize the domination of Indigenous Peoples through race misclassification. Specifically, Census data collection fails to capture accurate and reliable data due to serious methodological limitations. These implications for psychological research compel us to make several recommendations for psychologists: (1) engage with NHPI community partners in all research processes; (2) critically examine Census research design and consider oversampling NHPI households to ensure just data representation; (3) meaningfully engage when, whether and how to aggregate Asian Americans with NHPIs; and (4) use Indigeneity as a critical framework.
美国人口普查每十年进行一次,通过该普查,美国政府对种族和族裔进行了分类,历史上一直将夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(以下简称 NHPI)归为“亚洲或太平洋岛民”。这种归并通过多种机制加剧了 NHPI 的健康不公正和不平等,因为它掩盖了 NHPI 复杂而多样的经历,他们与定居者国家的地位和关系在质和量上都与亚裔美国人截然不同。本批判性评论审查了联邦文件和研究,以研究泛民族分类是如何通过科学研究和方法来维持的。我们发现,由于美国对大洋洲部分地区(如夏威夷、萨摩亚、斐济和关岛)的殖民化以及强行实施的分类之间的定居者-殖民者关系,NHPI 的自决和自我认同受到阻碍,这种分类仍然被用来合法化通过种族错误分类对原住民的统治。具体来说,由于严重的方法学限制,人口普查数据收集无法捕捉到准确和可靠的数据。这些对心理研究的影响迫使我们向心理学家提出以下建议:(1)在所有研究过程中与 NHPI 社区伙伴合作;(2)批判性地审查人口普查研究设计,并考虑对 NHPI 家庭进行过采样,以确保公正的数据代表性;(3)在何时、是否以及如何将亚裔美国人与 NHPI 合并时进行有意义的参与;以及(4)使用本土性作为一个关键框架。