• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅针对夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民的数据呈现:对人口普查中系统性的原住民信息缺失的批判性回顾及对心理学家的建议。

Just data representation for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders: A critical review of systemic Indigenous erasure in census and recommendations for psychologists.

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

School of Social Transformation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Jun;69(3-4):343-354. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12569. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12569
PMID:34878178
Abstract

The decennial Census survey marks the emergence of federal classifications of race and ethnicity by which the U.S. government has historically conflated Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPI, hereafter) as "Asian or Pacific Islander." This conflation amplifies health injustices and inequities of NHPIs through multiple mechanisms because it masks the complex and heterogeneous experiences of NHPIs, whose positions and relations with the settler state are qualitatively and substantially distinct from Asian Americans. This critical review examines federal documents and research to examine how the panethnic categorizations are often sustained through scientific inquiry and methodologies. We found that self-determination and self-identification for NHPIs are impeded by settler-colonial relations between U.S. colonization of parts of Oceania (e.g., Hawai'i, Sāmoa, Fiji, and Guam) and the forcefully imposed categorization that continues to be in use to legitimize the domination of Indigenous Peoples through race misclassification. Specifically, Census data collection fails to capture accurate and reliable data due to serious methodological limitations. These implications for psychological research compel us to make several recommendations for psychologists: (1) engage with NHPI community partners in all research processes; (2) critically examine Census research design and consider oversampling NHPI households to ensure just data representation; (3) meaningfully engage when, whether and how to aggregate Asian Americans with NHPIs; and (4) use Indigeneity as a critical framework.

摘要

美国人口普查每十年进行一次,通过该普查,美国政府对种族和族裔进行了分类,历史上一直将夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(以下简称 NHPI)归为“亚洲或太平洋岛民”。这种归并通过多种机制加剧了 NHPI 的健康不公正和不平等,因为它掩盖了 NHPI 复杂而多样的经历,他们与定居者国家的地位和关系在质和量上都与亚裔美国人截然不同。本批判性评论审查了联邦文件和研究,以研究泛民族分类是如何通过科学研究和方法来维持的。我们发现,由于美国对大洋洲部分地区(如夏威夷、萨摩亚、斐济和关岛)的殖民化以及强行实施的分类之间的定居者-殖民者关系,NHPI 的自决和自我认同受到阻碍,这种分类仍然被用来合法化通过种族错误分类对原住民的统治。具体来说,由于严重的方法学限制,人口普查数据收集无法捕捉到准确和可靠的数据。这些对心理研究的影响迫使我们向心理学家提出以下建议:(1)在所有研究过程中与 NHPI 社区伙伴合作;(2)批判性地审查人口普查研究设计,并考虑对 NHPI 家庭进行过采样,以确保公正的数据代表性;(3)在何时、是否以及如何将亚裔美国人与 NHPI 合并时进行有意义的参与;以及(4)使用本土性作为一个关键框架。

相似文献

1
Just data representation for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders: A critical review of systemic Indigenous erasure in census and recommendations for psychologists.仅针对夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民的数据呈现:对人口普查中系统性的原住民信息缺失的批判性回顾及对心理学家的建议。
Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Jun;69(3-4):343-354. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12569. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
The Mauli Ola Study: A Unique Academic-Community Partnership With MA'O Organic Farms to Understand and Address Health Inequities Among Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders in Hawai'i.毛里奥拉研究:与 MA'O 有机农场建立独特的学术-社区伙伴关系,以了解和解决夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民的健康不平等问题。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Nov;24(6):1087-1090. doi: 10.1177/15248399231190356.
3
Comparing Obesity-Related Health Disparities among Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, Asians, and Whites in California: Reinforcing the Need for Data Disaggregation and Operationalization.比较加利福尼亚州夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民、亚裔和白人之间与肥胖相关的健康差异:强化数据分类和实施的必要性。
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016 Nov;75(11):337-344.
4
No Kākou, Na Kākou - For Us, By Us: Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders Informing Race Data Collection Standards for Hawai'i.没有我们,就没有我们:让夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民参与制定夏威夷的种族数据收集标准。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2023 Oct;82(10 Suppl 1):73-76.
5
Incidence of ESKD Among Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders Living in the 50 US States and Pacific Island Territories.美国 50 个州和太平洋岛屿地区的本土夏威夷人和太平洋岛民中终末期肾病的发病率。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Sep;76(3):340-349.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Age and Sex Distributions of 31 Common Racial Groups in Hawai'i: A Shiny Web Application.夏威夷 31 个常见种族群体的年龄和性别分布:一个闪亮的网络应用程序。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2023 Oct;82(10 Suppl 1):89-96.
7
Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders.环境正义、本土知识体系与夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民
Hum Biol. 2020 Nov 17;92(1):45-57. doi: 10.13110/humanbiology.92.1.06.
8
Toward improved health: disaggregating Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander data.迈向更健康的未来:剖析亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民的数据。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1731-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1731.
9
Frequency and predictors of health services use by Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders: evidence from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey.美国国家健康访谈调查:美属夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民的卫生服务使用频率和预测因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 21;18(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3368-3.
10
No Equity without Data Equity: Data Reporting Gaps for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders as Structural Racism.没有数据公平就没有公平:作为结构性种族主义的原住民夏威夷人和太平洋岛民的数据报告差距。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Apr 1;47(2):159-200. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9517177.

引用本文的文献

1
Naming and Framing: Six Principles for Embedding Health Equity Language in Policy Research, Writing, and Practice.命名与构建框架:将健康公平语言融入政策研究、写作与实践的六项原则。
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):130-152. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.70000. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
2
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations in genomic research.基因组研究中的夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民群体。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Sep 30;9(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00428-6.
3
Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.
在年龄与生命历程的定量研究中增强多样性、公平性和包容性。
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2023 Sep 5;33(4):140-144. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prad018. eCollection 2023.
4
Parental Cognitions, Treatment Engagement, and Child Outcomes of ADHD Behavioral Treatment among Asian American Families.美国家庭中 ADHD 行为治疗的父母认知、治疗参与度与儿童治疗效果。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Mar;52(3):325-337. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01139-9. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
5
Digital Determinants of Health: Health data poverty amplifies existing health disparities-A scoping review.健康的数字决定因素:健康数据贫困加剧了现有的健康差距——一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000313. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.增强年龄与生命历程定量研究中的多样性、公平性和包容性。
Innov Aging. 2023 Sep 5;7(6):igad059. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad059. eCollection 2023.
7
Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.在年龄与生命历程的定量研究中增强多样性、公平性和包容性。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Oct 28;78(11):2019-2023. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad151.
8
Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.在年龄与生命历程的定量研究中增强多样性、公平性和包容性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad075.
9
Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.增强年龄与生命历程定量研究中的多样性、公平性和包容性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Oct 9;78(10):1702-1706. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad096.
10
Misracialization of Indigenous people in population health and mortality studies: a scoping review to establish promising practices.人口健康和死亡率研究中对原住民的错误种族化:建立有前途的实践的范围综述。
Epidemiol Rev. 2023 Dec 20;45(1):63-81. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxad001.