Suppr超能文献

双酚 A 自由型与传统临时冠桥材料单体释放的体外比较研究。

A comparative in vitro study on monomer release from bisphenol A-free and conventional temporary crown and bridge materials.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Institute for Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2021 Dec;129(6):e12826. doi: 10.1111/eos.12826. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the release of common monomers from two conventional and two bisphenol A (BPA)-free temporary crown and bridge materials. Cylindrical samples of all materials were prepared (N = 90; five samples for each material and cycle of analysis). All samples were immersed in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water and incubated for 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 7 days in an incubation shaker at 37°C and 112 rpm. Extraction was performed in accordance with ISO 10993-12. Eluted monomers were detected and quantified by HPLC coupled with ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (HPLC-UV/Vis-MS). Analysis of BPA was performed by HPLC coupled with ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (HPLC-UV/Vis) and positive results were verified by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Neither bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) nor BPA was quantifiable in any of the crown and bridge samples investigated in the present study. However, all samples contained triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and/or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) after 24 h of incubation. Statistical analysis showed that significantly more UDMA was released from the BPA-free materials than from the conventional materials. All concentrations of UDMA measured were below the effective cytotoxic concentrations previously reported. However, for a few materials, especially BPA-free temporary crown and bridge materials, the levels of UDMA were above previously reported potentially harmful concentrations for local cells. As BPA-free materials were introduced as being more biocompatible than materials containing BPA, substitution of Bis-GMA with UDMA should be further investigated.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨两种传统型和两种双酚 A(BPA)自由型临时冠桥材料常见单体的释放情况。所有材料均制备圆柱形样本(N=90;每种材料和分析周期各五个样本)。所有样本均浸入高效液相色谱(HPLC)级水中,并在 37°C 和 112 rpm 的孵育摇床中孵育 1 h、12 h、24 h 和 7 天。根据 ISO 10993-12 进行萃取。洗脱单体通过高效液相色谱-紫外可见分光光度法和质谱联用(HPLC-UV/Vis-MS)进行检测和定量分析。通过高效液相色谱-紫外可见分光光度法(HPLC-UV/Vis)进行 BPA 分析,阳性结果通过高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)验证。在本研究中,调查的所有冠桥样本中均未检测到或定量到双酚 A-缩水甘油甲基丙烯酸酯(Bis-GMA)或 BPA。然而,在孵育 24 h 后,所有样本均含有三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)和/或尿烷二甲基丙烯酸酯(UDMA)。统计分析表明,BPA 自由型材料释放的 UDMA 明显多于传统型材料。测量的所有 UDMA 浓度均低于先前报道的有效细胞毒性浓度。然而,对于少数材料,尤其是 BPA 自由型临时冠桥材料,其 UDMA 水平高于先前报道的对局部细胞有潜在危害的浓度。由于 BPA 自由型材料被认为比含 BPA 的材料更具生物相容性,因此应进一步研究用 UDMA 替代 Bis-GMA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验