• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨基于急诊科的护理转介干预的差异化反应。

Exploring differential response to an emergency department-based care transition intervention.

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.026
PMID:34879480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354797/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify multivariable subgroups of patients with differential responses to a nurse-delivered care transition intervention after an emergency department (ED) visit in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using an emerging data-driven method.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of RCT.

PARTICIPANTS

512 individuals enrolled in an RCT of a nurse-delivered care transition intervention after an ED visit. All 512 participants were included in a pre-specified subgroup analysis, and 451 of these had sufficient complete case data to be included in a model-based recursive (MoB) partitioning analysis.

METHODS

The primary outcome was having at least one ED visit in 30 days after the index ED visit. Two analytical methods explored heterogeneity of treatment effects: data driven model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) using 37 candidate baseline variables, and a contextual point of comparison with prespecified subgroups defined by ED super-user status (≥ 3 ED visits in previous 6 months or not), sex (male/female), and age, individually examined via treatment arm by subgroup interaction terms in logistic regression models. Internal validation of the MoB analysis via bootstrap resampling with an optimism corrected c-statistic was conducted to provide a bias-corrected estimate.

RESULTS

MoB detected treatment effect heterogeneity in a single subgroup, marital status. Unmarried patients randomized to the intervention had a repeat ED use rate of 22% compared to 34% in the usual care group; married patients randomized to the intervention had a 27% ED return rate compared to 12% in the usual care group. Internal validation demonstrated an optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.54. No treatment-by-covariate subgroup interactions were identified among the 3 prespecified subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Although exploratory, the results of the MoB analysis suggest that patient factors related to social relationships such as marital status may be important contributors to differential response to a care transition intervention after an ED visit. These were characteristics that the investigators had not anticipated or planned to examine in the individual prespecified subgroup analysis. Data-driven methods can yield unexpected findings and contribute to a more complete understanding of differential treatment effects in subgroup analysis, which can inform further work on development of effective care transition interventions in the ED setting.

摘要

目的

使用新兴的数据驱动方法,从一项随机对照试验(RCT)中识别出对急诊科(ED)就诊后护士提供的护理过渡干预有不同反应的患者的多变量亚组。

设计

RCT 的二次分析。

参与者

512 名参加 ED 就诊后护士提供的护理过渡干预 RCT 的个体。所有 512 名参与者均纳入预先指定的亚组分析,其中 451 名参与者有足够的完整病例数据纳入基于模型的递归(MoB)分区分析。

方法

主要结局是在索引 ED 就诊后 30 天内至少有一次 ED 就诊。两种分析方法探索了治疗效果的异质性:使用 37 个候选基线变量的基于数据的基于模型的递归分区(MoB),以及通过按亚组交互项在逻辑回归模型中逐个检查 ED 超级用户状态(过去 6 个月内就诊 3 次或以上/没有)、性别(男/女)和年龄定义的预设亚组的上下文比较点的方法,来探索治疗效果的异质性。通过 bootstrap 重采样进行 MoB 分析的内部验证,并使用校正后的 c 统计量提供偏倚校正估计。

结果

MoB 在单个亚组婚姻状况中检测到治疗效果的异质性。随机分配到干预组的未婚患者再次 ED 使用率为 22%,而常规护理组为 34%;随机分配到干预组的已婚患者再次 ED 就诊率为 27%,而常规护理组为 12%。内部验证显示校正后的 c 统计量为 0.54。在 3 个预设亚组中未发现治疗与协变量亚组的交互作用。

结论

尽管这是一项探索性研究,但 MoB 分析的结果表明,与社会关系相关的患者因素(如婚姻状况)可能是 ED 就诊后护理过渡干预反应不同的重要因素。这些是研究人员在个体预设亚组分析中没有预料到或计划研究的特征。数据驱动的方法可以产生意想不到的发现,并有助于更全面地了解亚组分析中的差异治疗效果,这可以为 ED 环境中有效护理过渡干预的进一步研究提供信息。

相似文献

1
Exploring differential response to an emergency department-based care transition intervention.探讨基于急诊科的护理转介干预的差异化反应。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
A randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a paramedic-delivered care transitions intervention to reduce emergency department revisits.一项随机对照试验测试了由护理人员实施的护理交接干预措施减少急诊复诊的效果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 3;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0792-5.
3
Differential Effects of an Emergency Department-to-Home Care Transitions Intervention in an Older Adult Population: A Latent Class Analysis.老年人群中急诊到家庭护理过渡干预的差异效应:潜在类别分析。
Med Care. 2023 Jun 1;61(6):400-408. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001848. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Discharge Information and Support for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科出院患者的出院信息与支持:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05319-6. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Patient experiences of a care transition intervention for Veterans to reduce emergency department visits.患者对退伍军人护理转接干预措施的体验,以减少急诊就诊次数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):388-397. doi: 10.1111/acem.14661. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Outcomes of a Nursing Home-to-Community Care Transition Program.养老院到社区护理过渡项目的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2440-2446.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
A randomized trial exploring the effect of a telephone call follow-up on care plan compliance among older adults discharged home from the emergency department.一项随机试验,旨在探索电话随访对从急诊科出院回家的老年患者护理计划依从性的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/acem.12308.
8
Effect of Patient-Centered Transitional Care Services on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: The PACT-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.以患者为中心的过渡期护理服务对心力衰竭住院患者临床结局的影响:PACT-HF 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 26;321(8):753-761. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0710.
9
Effectiveness of Interventions to Decrease Emergency Department Visits by Adult Frequent Users: A Systematic Review.减少成年频繁就诊者急诊科就诊次数的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;24(1):40-52. doi: 10.1111/acem.13060.
10
Effect of a Self-care Intervention on 90-Day Outcomes in Patients With Acute Heart Failure Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.自我护理干预对急诊科出院的急性心力衰竭患者 90 天结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):200-208. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5763.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Effects of an Emergency Department-to-Home Care Transitions Intervention in an Older Adult Population: A Latent Class Analysis.老年人群中急诊到家庭护理过渡干预的差异效应:潜在类别分析。
Med Care. 2023 Jun 1;61(6):400-408. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001848. Epub 2023 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying treatment moderators of a trauma-informed parenting intervention with children in foster care: Using model-based recursive partitioning.识别创伤知情型养育干预对寄养儿童的治疗调节因素:使用基于模型的递归分区法。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105065. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105065. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
2
Application of Heterogeneity of Treatment-Effects Methods: Exploratory Analyses of a Trial of Exercise-Based Interventions for Knee Osteoarthritis.治疗效应异质性方法的应用:基于运动干预的膝关节骨关节炎试验的探索性分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;74(8):1359-1368. doi: 10.1002/acr.24564. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Optimizing emergency department care transitions to outpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.优化急诊护理向门诊环境的过渡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2667-2680. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.043. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol.一项基于数据的对哪些患者遵循试验方案的检查。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100631. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Social Isolation Associated with Future Health Care Utilization.社会隔离与未来医疗保健利用相关。
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Jun;24(3):333-337. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0106. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Model-Based Recursive Partitioning of Patients' Return Visits to Multispecialty Clinic During the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza (pH1N1).基于模型的2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行(pH1N1)期间患者对多专科诊所复诊情况的递归划分
Online J Public Health Inform. 2020 May 16;12(1):e4. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10576. eCollection 2020.
7
Identifying treatment effects of an informal caregiver education intervention to increase days in the community and decrease caregiver distress: a machine-learning secondary analysis of subgroup effects in the HI-FIVES randomized clinical trial.识别非正规照护者教育干预增加社区居住天数和减少照护者痛苦的治疗效果:HI-FIVES 随机临床试验亚组效应的机器学习二次分析。
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4113-x.
8
Short-Term VA Health Care Expenditures Following a Health Risk Assessment and Coaching Trial.健康风险评估与指导试验后的短期退伍军人事务部医疗保健支出
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1452-1457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05455-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Discharge Information and Support for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科出院患者的出院信息与支持:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05319-6. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.