Suppr超能文献

探讨基于急诊科的护理转介干预的差异化反应。

Exploring differential response to an emergency department-based care transition intervention.

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify multivariable subgroups of patients with differential responses to a nurse-delivered care transition intervention after an emergency department (ED) visit in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using an emerging data-driven method.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of RCT.

PARTICIPANTS

512 individuals enrolled in an RCT of a nurse-delivered care transition intervention after an ED visit. All 512 participants were included in a pre-specified subgroup analysis, and 451 of these had sufficient complete case data to be included in a model-based recursive (MoB) partitioning analysis.

METHODS

The primary outcome was having at least one ED visit in 30 days after the index ED visit. Two analytical methods explored heterogeneity of treatment effects: data driven model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) using 37 candidate baseline variables, and a contextual point of comparison with prespecified subgroups defined by ED super-user status (≥ 3 ED visits in previous 6 months or not), sex (male/female), and age, individually examined via treatment arm by subgroup interaction terms in logistic regression models. Internal validation of the MoB analysis via bootstrap resampling with an optimism corrected c-statistic was conducted to provide a bias-corrected estimate.

RESULTS

MoB detected treatment effect heterogeneity in a single subgroup, marital status. Unmarried patients randomized to the intervention had a repeat ED use rate of 22% compared to 34% in the usual care group; married patients randomized to the intervention had a 27% ED return rate compared to 12% in the usual care group. Internal validation demonstrated an optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.54. No treatment-by-covariate subgroup interactions were identified among the 3 prespecified subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Although exploratory, the results of the MoB analysis suggest that patient factors related to social relationships such as marital status may be important contributors to differential response to a care transition intervention after an ED visit. These were characteristics that the investigators had not anticipated or planned to examine in the individual prespecified subgroup analysis. Data-driven methods can yield unexpected findings and contribute to a more complete understanding of differential treatment effects in subgroup analysis, which can inform further work on development of effective care transition interventions in the ED setting.

摘要

目的

使用新兴的数据驱动方法,从一项随机对照试验(RCT)中识别出对急诊科(ED)就诊后护士提供的护理过渡干预有不同反应的患者的多变量亚组。

设计

RCT 的二次分析。

参与者

512 名参加 ED 就诊后护士提供的护理过渡干预 RCT 的个体。所有 512 名参与者均纳入预先指定的亚组分析,其中 451 名参与者有足够的完整病例数据纳入基于模型的递归(MoB)分区分析。

方法

主要结局是在索引 ED 就诊后 30 天内至少有一次 ED 就诊。两种分析方法探索了治疗效果的异质性:使用 37 个候选基线变量的基于数据的基于模型的递归分区(MoB),以及通过按亚组交互项在逻辑回归模型中逐个检查 ED 超级用户状态(过去 6 个月内就诊 3 次或以上/没有)、性别(男/女)和年龄定义的预设亚组的上下文比较点的方法,来探索治疗效果的异质性。通过 bootstrap 重采样进行 MoB 分析的内部验证,并使用校正后的 c 统计量提供偏倚校正估计。

结果

MoB 在单个亚组婚姻状况中检测到治疗效果的异质性。随机分配到干预组的未婚患者再次 ED 使用率为 22%,而常规护理组为 34%;随机分配到干预组的已婚患者再次 ED 就诊率为 27%,而常规护理组为 12%。内部验证显示校正后的 c 统计量为 0.54。在 3 个预设亚组中未发现治疗与协变量亚组的交互作用。

结论

尽管这是一项探索性研究,但 MoB 分析的结果表明,与社会关系相关的患者因素(如婚姻状况)可能是 ED 就诊后护理过渡干预反应不同的重要因素。这些是研究人员在个体预设亚组分析中没有预料到或计划研究的特征。数据驱动的方法可以产生意想不到的发现,并有助于更全面地了解亚组分析中的差异治疗效果,这可以为 ED 环境中有效护理过渡干预的进一步研究提供信息。

相似文献

6
Outcomes of a Nursing Home-to-Community Care Transition Program.养老院到社区护理过渡项目的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2440-2446.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 May 11.

本文引用的文献

4
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol.一项基于数据的对哪些患者遵循试验方案的检查。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100631. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Social Isolation Associated with Future Health Care Utilization.社会隔离与未来医疗保健利用相关。
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Jun;24(3):333-337. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0106. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验