• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discharge Information and Support for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科出院患者的出院信息与支持:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05319-6. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Discharge information and support for veterans Receiving Outpatient Care in the Emergency Department: study design and methods.为在急诊科接受门诊治疗的退伍军人提供出院信息与支持:研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
3
A randomized trial exploring the effect of a telephone call follow-up on care plan compliance among older adults discharged home from the emergency department.一项随机试验,旨在探索电话随访对从急诊科出院回家的老年患者护理计划依从性的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/acem.12308.
4
A randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a paramedic-delivered care transitions intervention to reduce emergency department revisits.一项随机对照试验测试了由护理人员实施的护理交接干预措施减少急诊复诊的效果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 3;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0792-5.
5
Telephone Follow-Up for Older Adults Discharged to Home from the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.电话随访对从急诊科出院回家的老年患者的影响:一项实用随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):452-458. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15142. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Effect of a Self-care Intervention on 90-Day Outcomes in Patients With Acute Heart Failure Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.自我护理干预对急诊科出院的急性心力衰竭患者 90 天结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):200-208. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5763.
7
Telephone follow-up to reduce unplanned hospital returns for older emergency department patients: A randomized trial.电话随访以减少老年急诊科患者的非计划性医院返诊:一项随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Nov;69(11):3157-3166. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17336. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Effectiveness of a care transitions intervention for older adults discharged home from the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial.老年患者从急诊科出院后实施过渡期护理干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;29(1):51-63. doi: 10.1111/acem.14357. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
Association of a Callback Program With Emergency Department Revisit Rates Among Patients Seeking Emergency Care.呼叫回访计划与急诊就诊患者急诊复诊率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213154. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13154.
10
Improving the ED-to-Home Transition: The Community Paramedic-Delivered Care Transitions Intervention-Preliminary Findings.改善 ED 到家庭的过渡:社区 PARAMEDIC 提供的护理过渡干预-初步发现。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2213-2220. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15475. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
2
Differential Effects of an Emergency Department-to-Home Care Transitions Intervention in an Older Adult Population: A Latent Class Analysis.老年人群中急诊到家庭护理过渡干预的差异效应:潜在类别分析。
Med Care. 2023 Jun 1;61(6):400-408. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001848. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Patient experiences of a care transition intervention for Veterans to reduce emergency department visits.患者对退伍军人护理转接干预措施的体验,以减少急诊就诊次数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):388-397. doi: 10.1111/acem.14661. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
The effectiveness of interventions to reduce adverse outcomes among older adults following Emergency Department discharge: umbrella review.干预措施在减少急诊科出院后老年患者不良结局方面的有效性:伞式综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 28;22(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03007-5.
5
Exploring differential response to an emergency department-based care transition intervention.探讨基于急诊科的护理转介干预的差异化反应。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Effectiveness of a care transitions intervention for older adults discharged home from the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial.老年患者从急诊科出院后实施过渡期护理干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;29(1):51-63. doi: 10.1111/acem.14357. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Psychological distress among medically complex veterans with a recent emergency department visit.近期急诊就诊的医学复杂性退伍军人的心理困扰。
Psychol Serv. 2022 May;19(2):353-359. doi: 10.1037/ser0000437. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Capsule Commentary on Hastings, et. al., Discharge Information and Support for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.对黑斯廷斯等人《急诊科出院患者的出院信息与支持:一项随机对照试验的结果》的简要评论
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):401. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05387-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Tele-Follow-Up of Older Adult Patients from the Geriatric Emergency Department Innovation (GEDI) Program.老年急诊科创新(GEDI)项目中老年患者的远程随访
Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jan 29;4(1):18. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4010018.
2
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
3
Managing High-Cost Healthcare Users: The International Search for Effective Evidence-Supported Strategies.管理高费用医疗保健用户:国际上寻找有效证据支持策略。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):1002-1008. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15257. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
4
Risk stratification for return emergency department visits among high-risk patients.高危患者急诊复诊的风险分层。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Aug 1;23(8):e275-e279.
5
Outcomes after observation stays among older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the USA: retrospective cohort study.美国老年医疗保险受益人的观察期住院结局:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Jun 20;357:j2616. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2616.
6
Adjusting Health Expenditures for Inflation: A Review of Measures for Health Services Research in the United States.调整卫生支出的通货膨胀率:美国卫生服务研究的措施述评。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):175-196. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12612. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
The Transition of Care Between Emergency Department and Primary Care: A Scoping Study.急诊科与初级保健之间的护理过渡:一项范围界定研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;24(2):201-215. doi: 10.1111/acem.13125. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
8
A Conceptual Model for Episodes of Acute, Unscheduled Care.急性非计划护理事件的概念模型。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):484-491.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Discharge information and support for veterans Receiving Outpatient Care in the Emergency Department: study design and methods.为在急诊科接受门诊治疗的退伍军人提供出院信息与支持:研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
10
Optimal older adult emergency care: Introducing multidisciplinary geriatric emergency department guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.优化老年人急诊护理:引入美国急诊医师学会、美国老年医学会、急诊护士协会及学术急诊医学协会的多学科老年急诊科指南。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 May;63(5):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.002.

急诊科出院患者的出院信息与支持:一项随机对照试验的结果

Discharge Information and Support for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Hastings Susan N, Stechuchak Karen M, Coffman Cynthia J, Mahanna Elizabeth P, Weinberger Morris, Van Houtven Courtney H, Schmader Kenneth E, Hendrix Cristina C, Kessler Chad, Hughes Jaime M, Ramos Katherine, Wieland G Darryl, Weiner Madeline, Robinson Katina, Oddone Eugene

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, HSR&D, Fulton Street, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05319-6. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-05319-6
PMID:31489559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6957582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little research has been done on primary care-based models to improve health care use after an emergency department (ED) visit.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of a primary care-based, nurse telephone support intervention for Veterans treated and released from the ED.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with 1:1 assignment to telephone support intervention or usual care arms (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01717976).

SETTING

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS) in Durham, NC.

PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred thirteen Veterans who were at high risk for repeat ED visits.

INTERVENTION

The telephone support intervention consisted of two core calls in the week following an ED visit. Call content focused on improving the ED to primary care transition, enhancing chronic disease management, and educating Veterans and family members about VHA and community services.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was repeat ED use within 30 days.

KEY RESULTS

Observed rates of repeat ED use at 30 days in usual care and intervention groups were 23.1% and 24.9%, respectively (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.7, 1.7; P = 0.6). The intervention group had a higher rate of having at least 1 primary care visit at 30 days (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.3). At 180 days, the intervention group had a higher rate of usage of a weight management program (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.6-7.5), diabetes/nutrition (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0-3.0), and home telehealth services (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0-2.9) compared with usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief primary care-based nurse telephone support program after an ED visit did not reduce repeat ED visits within 30 days, despite intervention participants' increased engagement with primary care and some chronic disease management services.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01717976.

摘要

背景

关于基于初级保健的模式以改善急诊科就诊后的医疗保健利用情况的研究较少。

目的

研究基于初级保健的护士电话支持干预对在急诊科接受治疗并出院的退伍军人的有效性。

设计

随机对照试验,按1:1分配至电话支持干预组或常规护理组(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01717976)。

地点

北卡罗来纳州达勒姆的退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统(VAHCS)。

参与者

513名有再次前往急诊科高风险的退伍军人。

干预措施

电话支持干预包括在急诊科就诊后的一周内进行两次核心电话随访。通话内容侧重于改善从急诊科到初级保健的过渡、加强慢性病管理以及向退伍军人及其家庭成员介绍退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和社区服务。

主要测量指标

主要结局是30天内再次前往急诊科就诊。

关键结果

常规护理组和干预组30天内再次前往急诊科就诊的观察率分别为23.1%和24.9%(比值比[OR]=1.1;95%置信区间[CI]=0.7, 1.7;P=0.6)。干预组在30天内至少进行1次初级保健就诊的比例更高(OR=1.6,95%CI=1.1 - 2.3)。在180天时,与常规护理相比,干预组使用体重管理项目(OR=3.5,95%CI=1.6 - 7.5)、糖尿病/营养项目(OR=1.8,95%CI=1.0 - 3.0)和家庭远程医疗服务(OR=1.7,95%CI=1.0 - 2.9)的比例更高。

结论

尽管干预参与者增加了对初级保健和一些慢性病管理服务的参与度,但急诊科就诊后基于初级保健的简短护士电话支持项目并未降低30天内再次前往急诊科就诊的次数。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01717976。