Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
BMJ. 2021 Dec 8;375:e066588. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066588.
To evaluate the effectiveness of remote proactive management of toxicities during chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer.
Pragmatic, cluster randomised trial.
20 cancer centres in Ontario, Canada, allocated by covariate constrained randomisation to remote management of toxicities or routine care.
All patients starting adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer at each centre. 25 patients from each centre completed patient reported outcome questionnaires.
Proactive, standardised, nurse led telephone management of common toxicities at two time points after each chemotherapy cycle.
The primary outcome, cluster level mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient during the whole course of chemotherapy treatment, was evaluated with routinely available administrative healthcare data. Secondary patient reported outcomes included toxicity, self-efficacy, and quality of life.
Baseline characteristics of participants were similar in the intervention (n=944) and control arms (n=1214); 22% were older than 65 years. Penetration (that is, the percentage of patients who received the intervention at each centre) was 50-86%. Mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient was 0.91 (standard deviation 0.28) in the intervention arm and 0.94 (0.40) in the control arm (P=0.94); 47% (1014 of 2158 patients) had at least one visit to the emergency department or a hospital admission during chemotherapy. Among 580 participants who completed the patient reported outcome questionnaires, at least one grade 3 toxicity was reported by 48% (134 of 278 patients) in the intervention arm and by 58% (163 of 283) in the control arm. No differences in self-efficacy, anxiety, or depression were found. Compared with baseline, the functional assessment of cancer therapy trial outcome index decreased by 6.1 and 9.0 points in the intervention and control participants, respectively.
Proactive, telephone based management of toxicities during chemotherapy did not result in fewer visits to the emergency department or hospital admissions. With the rapid rise in remote care because of the covid-19 pandemic, identifying scalable strategies for remote management of patients during cancer treatment is particularly relevant.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02485678.
评估早期乳腺癌化疗期间远程主动管理毒性的效果。
实用、集群随机试验。
加拿大安大略省的 20 个癌症中心,根据协变量约束随机分配,接受毒性的远程管理或常规护理。
每个中心开始辅助或新辅助化疗的所有早期乳腺癌患者。每个中心有 25 名患者完成了患者报告的结果问卷。
化疗后每两个时间点进行一次主动、标准化、由护士主导的常见毒性电话管理。
主要结局为整个化疗过程中每位患者急诊就诊或住院的平均就诊次数,采用常规可获得的行政医疗保健数据进行评估。次要患者报告的结果包括毒性、自我效能和生活质量。
干预组(n=944)和对照组(n=1214)参与者的基线特征相似;22%的人年龄大于 65 岁。渗透率(即每个中心接受干预的患者百分比)为 50-86%。干预组每位患者急诊就诊或住院的平均就诊次数为 0.91(标准差 0.28),对照组为 0.94(0.40)(P=0.94);47%(2158 名患者中有 1014 名)在化疗期间至少有一次急诊就诊或住院。在完成患者报告结果问卷的 580 名参与者中,干预组有 48%(278 名患者中有 134 名)和对照组有 58%(283 名患者中有 163 名)报告至少有一次 3 级毒性。自我效能、焦虑或抑郁无差异。与基线相比,干预组和对照组的癌症治疗功能评估试验结局指数分别下降了 6.1 分和 9.0 分。
化疗期间主动、基于电话的毒性管理并未导致急诊就诊或住院次数减少。由于 covid-19 大流行,远程护理迅速增加,因此确定癌症治疗期间远程管理患者的可扩展策略尤为重要。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02485678。