Suppr超能文献

向后行走速度储备能否区分高跌倒风险的老年人?

Can Backward Walking Speed Reserve Discriminate Older Adults at High Fall Risk?

作者信息

Yada Trishia T, Taulbee Logan, Balasubramanian Chitra, Freund Jane, Vallabhajosula Srikant

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, Elon, N.C.

Department of Clinical and Applied Movement Sciences, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Fla., USA.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2021 Nov 1;73(4):353-357. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0086. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

Abstract

The authors examine whether community-dwelling older adults at high fall risk have lower backward walking speed reserve (WSR) than their healthy counterparts. Twenty-one healthy older adults and 20 older adults at high fall risk performed five trials of forward walking at a self-selected and maximal pace. In addition, all participants walked backward at a self-selected pace, and 15 participants from each group walked backward at a maximal pace. WSR was calculated as the difference between maximal and self-selected walking speed. Comparisons between groups were made using a one-tailed independent samples -test or Mann-Whitney -test with an α value of 0.025. Older adults at high fall risk were significantly slower during self-selected forward walking (11.7%;  = 0.006), maximal forward walking (15.5%;  = 0.001), self-selected backward walking (25.3%;  = 0.002), and maximal backward walking (23.8%;  = 0.006). Older adults at high fall risk showed a lesser forward WSR (25.4%;  = 0.03) and backward WSR (23.7%;  = 0.03). Backward WSR is not useful for discriminating between healthy older adults and older adults at high fall risk. The results imply that forward or backward walking speed rather than WSR might be a useful measure.

摘要

作者们研究了社区中高跌倒风险的老年人与健康老年人相比,其向后行走速度储备(WSR)是否更低。21名健康老年人和20名高跌倒风险老年人以自选和最大速度进行了五次向前行走试验。此外,所有参与者以自选速度向后行走,每组15名参与者以最大速度向后行走。WSR计算为最大行走速度与自选行走速度之差。使用单尾独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验进行组间比较,α值为0.025。高跌倒风险的老年人在自选向前行走(11.7%;P = 0.006)、最大向前行走(15.5%;P = 0.001)、自选向后行走(25.3%;P = 0.002)和最大向后行走(23.8%;P = 0.006)时明显较慢。高跌倒风险老年人的向前WSR(25.4%;P = 0.03)和向后WSR(23.7%;P = 0.03)较低。向后WSR对区分健康老年人和高跌倒风险老年人没有用处。结果表明,向前或向后行走速度而非WSR可能是一个有用的指标。

相似文献

2
Backwards walking speed reserve in persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的倒退行走速度储备。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 May;85:105556. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105556. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

6
Walking speed: the functional vital sign.步行速度:功能性生命体征。
J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2.
7
Kinematic and kinetic analysis during forward and backward walking.正向和反向行走时的运动学和动力学分析。
Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):674-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
9
Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis.正常行走速度:描述性荟萃分析。
Physiotherapy. 2011 Sep;97(3):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 May 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验