Yada Trishia T, Taulbee Logan, Balasubramanian Chitra, Freund Jane, Vallabhajosula Srikant
Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, Elon, N.C.
Department of Clinical and Applied Movement Sciences, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Fla., USA.
Physiother Can. 2021 Nov 1;73(4):353-357. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0086. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
The authors examine whether community-dwelling older adults at high fall risk have lower backward walking speed reserve (WSR) than their healthy counterparts. Twenty-one healthy older adults and 20 older adults at high fall risk performed five trials of forward walking at a self-selected and maximal pace. In addition, all participants walked backward at a self-selected pace, and 15 participants from each group walked backward at a maximal pace. WSR was calculated as the difference between maximal and self-selected walking speed. Comparisons between groups were made using a one-tailed independent samples -test or Mann-Whitney -test with an α value of 0.025. Older adults at high fall risk were significantly slower during self-selected forward walking (11.7%; = 0.006), maximal forward walking (15.5%; = 0.001), self-selected backward walking (25.3%; = 0.002), and maximal backward walking (23.8%; = 0.006). Older adults at high fall risk showed a lesser forward WSR (25.4%; = 0.03) and backward WSR (23.7%; = 0.03). Backward WSR is not useful for discriminating between healthy older adults and older adults at high fall risk. The results imply that forward or backward walking speed rather than WSR might be a useful measure.
作者们研究了社区中高跌倒风险的老年人与健康老年人相比,其向后行走速度储备(WSR)是否更低。21名健康老年人和20名高跌倒风险老年人以自选和最大速度进行了五次向前行走试验。此外,所有参与者以自选速度向后行走,每组15名参与者以最大速度向后行走。WSR计算为最大行走速度与自选行走速度之差。使用单尾独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验进行组间比较,α值为0.025。高跌倒风险的老年人在自选向前行走(11.7%;P = 0.006)、最大向前行走(15.5%;P = 0.001)、自选向后行走(25.3%;P = 0.002)和最大向后行走(23.8%;P = 0.006)时明显较慢。高跌倒风险老年人的向前WSR(25.4%;P = 0.03)和向后WSR(23.7%;P = 0.03)较低。向后WSR对区分健康老年人和高跌倒风险老年人没有用处。结果表明,向前或向后行走速度而非WSR可能是一个有用的指标。