Suppr超能文献

创新的经皮内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并退行性不稳:一项非随机临床试验

Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Yin Peng, Ding Yi, Zhou Lijin, Xu Chunyang, Gao Haifeng, Pang Daming, Hai Yong, Yang Jincai

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2021 Dec 2;14:3685-3693. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S340004. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with instability is most common lumbar degenerative diseases for people with low back pain. The objective of this study was to compared the clinical effects for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative instability between the innovative percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2019 and April 2020, 114 patients with single-segment LSS were prospectively included in our study (ChiCTR1900022492). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on lumbar and leg pain (VAS-LBP, VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), serum creatine kinase (CK), the maximal cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle (Max-CSA) and the peak intensity of sulphur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent (PI) around the surgical incision by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were evaluated preoperatively, post-operatively and at regular follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up. The VAS-LBP, VAS-LP, ODI after operation were improved significantly compared to these data before operation in all the patients (P<0.05). The VAS-LBP at 1 weeks, 3 months after operation in PE-TLIF group were significantly lower than these in PLIF group (P<0.05). The injury degree of multifidus muscle evaluated by MAX-CSA and PI was significantly less in PE-TLIF group after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on the complication rate between these two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results presented PE-TLIF technique could obtain comparable effective outcomes as conventional PLIF for the treatment of LSS with degenerative instability. The patients with PE-TLIF had less muscle injury, less pain and quicker postoperative rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

伴有腰椎不稳的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是引起腰痛患者最常见的腰椎退行性疾病。本研究的目的是比较创新性经皮内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(PE-TLIF)技术与后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)技术治疗伴有退行性不稳的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床效果。

患者与方法

2019年4月至2020年4月,前瞻性纳入114例单节段LSS患者(中国临床试验注册中心注册号:ChiCTR1900022492)。分别于术前、术后及定期随访时评估患者的腰部和腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-LBP、VAS-LP)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、血清肌酸激酶(CK)、多裂肌最大横截面积(Max-CSA)以及通过超声造影评估手术切口周围六氟化硫微泡造影剂的峰值强度(PI)。

结果

所有患者均获随访。所有患者术后的VAS-LBP、VAS-LP、ODI较术前均显著改善(P<0.05)。PE-TLIF组术后1周、3个月时的VAS-LBP显著低于PLIF组(P<0.05)。术后PE-TLIF组通过MAX-CSA和PI评估的多裂肌损伤程度显著更小(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

我们的结果表明,PE-TLIF技术在治疗伴有退行性不稳的LSS时可获得与传统PLIF相当的有效结果。接受PE-TLIF治疗的患者肌肉损伤更小、疼痛更轻且术后康复更快。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fe7/8648278/1313eef60a62/JPR-14-3685-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验