Gong Su-Gang, Wu Wen-Hui, Li Chao, Zhao Qin-Hua, Jiang Rong, Luo Ci-Jun, Qiu Hong-Ling, Liu Jin-Ming, Wang Lan, Zhang Rui
Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 22;8:745578. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.745578. eCollection 2021.
The 2015 European pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines recommend a risk stratification strategy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We aimed to investigate the validation and potential prognostic information in Chinese patients. The risk assessment variables proposed by the PH guidelines were performed by using the WHO function class, 6-min walking distance, brain natriuretic peptide or its N-terminal fragment, right arterial pressure, cardiac index, mixed venous saturation, right atrium area, pericardial effusion, peak oxygen consumption, and ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide. An abbreviated version also was applied. A total of 392 patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) were enrolled between 2009 and 2018. After a median interval of 13 months, re-evaluation assessments were available for 386 subjects. The PAH guidelines risk tool may effectively discriminate three risk groups and mortality ( < 0.001) both at the baseline and re-evaluation. Meanwhile, its simplified risk version was valid for baseline and accurately predicted the risk of death in all the risk groups ( < 0.001). At the time of re-evaluation, the percentage of low-risk group has an increase, but a greater proportion achieved the high-risk group and a lesser proportion maintained in the intermediate-risk group. The 2015 European PH guidelines and its simplified version risk stratification assessment present an effective discrimination of different risk groups and accurate mortality estimates in Chinese patients with IPAH. Changes of risk proportion at re-evaluation implicated that natural treatment decisions may not be consistently with goal-oriented treatment strategy.
2015年欧洲肺动脉高压(PH)指南推荐了一种肺动脉高压(PAH)的风险分层策略。我们旨在研究该策略在中国患者中的有效性及潜在的预后信息。通过使用世界卫生组织功能分级、6分钟步行距离、脑钠肽或其N端片段、右动脉压、心脏指数、混合静脉血氧饱和度、右心房面积、心包积液、峰值耗氧量以及二氧化碳通气当量,对PH指南提出的风险评估变量进行评估。同时应用了一个简化版本。2009年至2018年共纳入392例特发性PAH(IPAH)患者。在中位间隔13个月后,对386名受试者进行了重新评估。PAH指南风险工具在基线和重新评估时均能有效区分三个风险组及死亡率(<0.001)。同时,其简化风险版本在基线时有效,且能准确预测所有风险组的死亡风险(<0.001)。在重新评估时,低风险组的比例有所增加,但高风险组的比例增加更多,而中风险组的比例维持在较低水平。2015年欧洲PH指南及其简化版本的风险分层评估能有效区分中国IPAH患者的不同风险组,并准确估计死亡率。重新评估时风险比例的变化表明,自然治疗决策可能与目标导向治疗策略不一致。