Department of Psychology.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022 Jan;131(1):73-85. doi: 10.1037/abn0000702. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
Stressors can undermine smokers' attempts to quit smoking. Although contemporary theories and animal models support this idea, human research has struggled to demonstrate definitively the relationship between stressors and smoking. Researchers have employed more ecologically valid methods like ecological momentary assessment to address this question, but studies focusing explicitly on stressors remain sparse and findings inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of stressful event intensity on smoking and craving among cigarette smokers during a quit attempt. We conducted preregistered, complementary concurrent and prospective (i.e., 8-hour lag window between stressful event and outcomes) analyses to maximize statistical power and provide temporal ordering, respectively. We also conducted follow-up moderation (Lag × Stressful Event Intensity) analyses. We hypothesized that smokers would be more likely to report both smoking and craving as the intensity of stressful events increased. Cigarette smokers ( = 125; 77 male) were randomly assigned to take nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or placebo and provided 4x daily self-reports during the first 2 weeks of a quit attempt. Stressful events increased craving and the probability of smoking in concurrent analyses, and lag moderated the effect of stressful event intensity in follow-up prospective lagged analyses. NRT reduced the probability of smoking but not craving and did not moderate the effect of stressful events on smoking or craving. This study supports a prospective relationship between stressful events and smoking/craving in situ and demonstrates that NRT does not reduce the impact of stressors on smoking or craving. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
应激源会破坏吸烟者戒烟的努力。尽管当代理论和动物模型支持这一观点,但人类研究仍难以明确证明应激源与吸烟之间的关系。研究人员采用了更具生态效度的方法,如生态瞬时评估,来解决这个问题,但专门研究应激源的研究仍然很少,结果也不一致。本研究旨在考察戒烟尝试期间应激事件强度对吸烟者吸烟和吸烟欲望的影响。我们进行了预先注册的、互补的同期和前瞻性(即,在应激事件和结果之间有 8 小时的滞后窗口)分析,分别以最大限度地提高统计效力和提供时间顺序。我们还进行了后续的调节(滞后×应激事件强度)分析。我们假设,随着应激事件强度的增加,吸烟者报告吸烟和吸烟欲望的可能性越大。125 名吸烟者(77 名男性)被随机分配接受尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)或安慰剂,并在戒烟尝试的前 2 周内每天 4 次提供自我报告。在同期分析中,应激事件增加了吸烟欲望和吸烟的可能性,滞后在后续前瞻性滞后分析中调节了应激事件强度的影响。NRT 降低了吸烟的可能性,但没有降低吸烟欲望的可能性,也没有调节应激事件对吸烟或吸烟欲望的影响。这项研究支持应激源与现场吸烟/吸烟欲望之间存在前瞻性关系,并表明 NRT 不能减轻应激源对吸烟或吸烟欲望的影响。