Suppr超能文献

将头痛触发因素管理策略整合到认知行为疗法中:一项随机对照试验。

Integrating headache trigger management strategies into cognitive-behavioral therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University.

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2021 Oct;40(10):674-685. doi: 10.1037/hea0001115.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, the standard advice to individuals suffering from migraine and tension-type headache was that the best way to prevent headaches is to avoid the triggers. This advice has been challenged in recent years and the Trigger Avoidance Model of Headache has been proposed, which suggests that one pathway to developing a headache disorder is by avoiding triggers resulting in trigger sensitization. The objective of the study was to evaluate a novel intervention for primary headache comprising a new approach to trigger management that includes exposure to some triggers with the goal of trigger desensitization (learning to cope with triggers [LCT]) integrated into a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program (LCT/CBT).

METHOD

The study was a randomized controlled trial comparing LCT/CBT to the same treatment program but using the traditional approach to trigger management of encouraging trigger avoidance (avoid/CBT), and to a waiting-list/treatment-as-usual control condition (WL/TAU). Adults suffering from primary headache (88 female/35 male) were allocated to the three conditions.

RESULTS

The three groups significantly differed from baseline to posttreatment on the primary outcome measure of attack frequency, and LCT/CBT significantly differed from WL/TAU but Avoid/CBT did not. Similar results were obtained on the secondary outcome measures, and treatment gains were maintained at 4- and 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest the value of using LCT as a component of a CBT program but were not conclusive as the direct comparisons between the two treatment conditions failed to reach statistical significance. The findings support a study of LCT/CBT with a larger sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

传统上,对于偏头痛和紧张性头痛患者,标准建议是避免诱因是预防头痛的最佳方法。近年来,这一建议受到了挑战,提出了头痛的触发回避模型,该模型表明,导致头痛障碍的一种途径是通过回避触发因素导致的触发敏感化。本研究的目的是评估一种新的原发性头痛干预措施,该干预措施包括一种新的触发管理方法,该方法包括接触一些触发因素,目标是使触发脱敏(学会应对触发因素[LCT]),并将其整合到认知行为疗法(CBT)方案中(LCT/CBT)。

方法

该研究为随机对照试验,比较了 LCT/CBT 与相同的治疗方案,但采用了传统的触发管理方法,即鼓励避免触发因素(避免/CBT),以及等待名单/常规治疗对照条件(WL/TAU)。原发性头痛患者(88 名女性/35 名男性)被分配到这三种条件中。

结果

三组在主要结局测量的攻击频率上与基线相比均有显著差异,LCT/CBT 与 WL/TAU 显著不同,但避免/CBT 没有。次要结局测量也得到了类似的结果,治疗效果在 4 个月和 12 个月的随访中得以维持。

结论

结果表明,将 LCT 作为 CBT 方案的一个组成部分的价值,但由于两种治疗条件之间的直接比较未达到统计学意义,因此结果尚不确定。这些发现支持了对 LCT/CBT 的更大样本研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验