Lange Tobias, Deventer Niklas, Gosheger Georg, Lampe Lukas P, Bockholt Sebastian, Schulze Boevingloh Albert, Schulte Tobias L
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5569. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235569.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) primarily on acute lumbar back pain (aLBP), and secondarily on physical function and quality of life. This randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded trial with 12-week follow-up (FU) randomized 63 patients with aLBP 1:1 into two groups receiving either rESWT (intervention) or sham rESWT (placebo) with a manipulated shockwave head not delivering any shockwaves. Both, rESWT and sham procedure were carried out eight times for four weeks. Both groups received additional analgesics and physiotherapy twice a week. Primary patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) was the visual analogue scale for aLBP (VAS-LBP). Secondary PROMs included the Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), EuroQol EQ-5D-3L, and the Beck Depression Index (BDI-II). Primary endpoint was a between-arm comparison of mean changes in VAS-LBP from baseline to final FU. At randomization, there were no differences between the two groups in relation to age and PROMs. Both groups showed significant improvement in all PROMs at final FU. VAS-LBP declined by 60.7% ( < 0.001) in the intervention and by 86.4% ( < 0.001) in the sham group. The intervention group showed significantly less pain relief after 4 and 12 weeks. The EQ-5D submodality pain showed significantly inferior results for the intervention (1.5 (0.58)) compared to the sham group (1.1 (0.33)) ( < 0.014) after eight weeks. No significant intergroup differences were observed for RDQ, ODI or BDI-II. Additional rESWT alongside conventional guideline therapy in aLBP does not have any significant effects on pain intensity, physical function, or quality of life. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study with a high level of evidence reporting the efficacy of rESWT in aLBP treatment and will be a future basis for decision-making.
本研究的目的是主要调查径向体外冲击波疗法(rESWT)对急性腰痛(aLBP)的影响,其次调查其对身体功能和生活质量的影响。这项随机、安慰剂对照、单盲试验,随访12周(FU),将63例aLBP患者按1:1随机分为两组,分别接受rESWT(干预组)或假rESWT(安慰剂组),假rESWT使用的冲击波探头不产生任何冲击波。rESWT和假治疗均进行8次,为期四周。两组均每周额外接受两次镇痛药治疗和物理治疗。主要患者报告结局指标(PROM)是aLBP的视觉模拟量表(VAS-LBP)。次要PROM包括奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)、罗兰和莫里斯残疾问卷(RDQ)、欧洲五维健康量表EQ-5D-3L以及贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)。主要终点是比较两组从基线到最终随访时VAS-LBP平均变化的组间差异。随机分组时,两组在年龄和PROM方面无差异。两组在最终随访时所有PROM均有显著改善。干预组VAS-LBP下降了60.7%(<0.001),假手术组下降了86.4%(<0.001)。干预组在4周和12周后的疼痛缓解明显较少。八周后,与假手术组(1.1(0.33))相比,干预组EQ-5D子模式疼痛的结果明显较差(1.5(0.58))(<0.014)。RDQ、ODI或BDI-II未观察到显著的组间差异。在aLBP的常规指南治疗基础上额外进行rESWT对疼痛强度、身体功能或生活质量没有任何显著影响。据我们所知,这是第一项具有高度证据水平的研究,报告了rESWT在aLBP治疗中的疗效,将成为未来决策的依据。