• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合信号通路数据库与网络拓扑结构。

Reconciling Signaling Pathway Databases with Network Topologies.

机构信息

Biology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Pac Symp Biocomput. 2022;27:211-222.

PMID:34890150
Abstract

A major goal of molecular systems biology is to understand the coordinated function of genes or proteins in response to cellular signals and to understand these dynamics in the context of disease. Signaling pathway databases such as KEGG, NetPath, NCI-PID, and Panther describe the molecular interactions involved in different cellular responses. While the same pathway may be present in different databases, prior work has shown that the particular proteins and interactions differ across database annotations. However, to our knowledge no one has attempted to quantify their structural differences. It is important to characterize artifacts or other biases within pathway databases, which can provide a more informed interpretation for downstream analyses. In this work we consider signaling pathways as graphs and we use topological measures to study their structure. We find that topological characterization using graphlets (small, connected subgraphs) distinguishes signaling pathways from appropriate null models of interaction networks. Next, we quantify topological similarity across pathway databases. Our analysis reveals that the pathways harbor database-specific characteristics implying that even though these databases describe the same pathways, they tend to be systematically different from one another. We show that pathway-specific topology can be uncovered after accounting for database-specific structure. This work presents the first step towards elucidating common pathway structure beyond their specific database annotations.Data Availability: https://github.com/Reed-CompBio/pathway-reconciliation.

摘要

分子系统生物学的主要目标是了解基因或蛋白质在响应细胞信号时的协调功能,并在疾病的背景下了解这些动态。KEGG、NetPath、NCI-PID 和 Panther 等信号通路数据库描述了不同细胞反应中涉及的分子相互作用。虽然相同的途径可能存在于不同的数据库中,但先前的工作表明,特定的蛋白质和相互作用在数据库注释中存在差异。然而,据我们所知,没有人试图量化它们的结构差异。重要的是要描述通路数据库中的伪影或其他偏差,这可以为下游分析提供更明智的解释。在这项工作中,我们将信号通路视为图,并使用拓扑度量来研究它们的结构。我们发现,使用图元(小的、连通的子图)进行拓扑特征描述可以将信号通路与交互网络的适当空模型区分开来。接下来,我们量化了通路数据库之间的拓扑相似性。我们的分析表明,这些途径具有数据库特有的特征,这意味着即使这些数据库描述了相同的途径,它们彼此之间也往往存在系统差异。我们表明,在考虑到特定数据库的结构后,可以揭示途径特有的拓扑结构。这项工作是阐明共同途径结构的第一步,超越了它们特定的数据库注释。

数据可用性

https://github.com/Reed-CompBio/pathway-reconciliation。

相似文献

1
Reconciling Signaling Pathway Databases with Network Topologies.整合信号通路数据库与网络拓扑结构。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2022;27:211-222.
2
Creating and analyzing pathway and protein interaction compendia for modelling signal transduction networks.创建和分析用于信号转导网络建模的通路和蛋白质相互作用汇编。
BMC Syst Biol. 2012 May 1;6:29. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-29.
3
HPD: an online integrated human pathway database enabling systems biology studies.HPD:一个在线综合人类途径数据库,支持系统生物学研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 8;10 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S11-S5.
4
Hypergraph-based connectivity measures for signaling pathway topologies.基于超图的信号通路拓扑连接性度量。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Oct 25;15(10):e1007384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007384. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Growing Directed Acyclic Graphs: Optimization Functions for Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms.生长有向无环图:通路重建算法的优化函数。
J Comput Biol. 2023 Jul;30(7):814-828. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2022.0376. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Xtalk: a path-based approach for identifying crosstalk between signaling pathways.Xtalk:一种基于路径的信号通路间串扰识别方法。
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jan 15;32(2):242-51. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv549. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
7
Extracting reaction networks from databases-opening Pandora's box.从数据库中提取反应网络——打开潘多拉的盒子。
Brief Bioinform. 2014 Nov;15(6):973-83. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt058. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
8
Automating parameter selection to avoid implausible biological pathway models.自动化参数选择,避免不合理的生物途径模型。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2021 Feb 23;7(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41540-020-00167-1.
9
IPAD: the Integrated Pathway Analysis Database for Systematic Enrichment Analysis.IPAD:系统富集分析的综合途径分析数据库。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S15-S7. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Predicting lncRNA-disease associations using network topological similarity based on deep mining heterogeneous networks.基于深度挖掘异质网络的网络拓扑相似性预测 lncRNA-疾病关联。
Math Biosci. 2019 Sep;315:108229. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.108229. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
GRPhIN: graphlet characterization of regulatory and physical interaction networks.GRPhIN:调控和物理相互作用网络的图元特征
Bioinform Adv. 2025 Jul 21;5(1):vbaf176. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf176. eCollection 2025.
2
Detecting and dissecting signaling crosstalk via the multilayer network integration of signaling and regulatory interactions.通过信号转导和调控相互作用的多层网络整合来检测和剖析信号串扰。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 11;52(1):e5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1035.
3
Identification of disease modules using higher-order network structure.
利用高阶网络结构识别疾病模块。
Bioinform Adv. 2023 Oct 4;3(1):vbad140. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad140. eCollection 2023.
4
On the influence of several factors on pathway enrichment analysis.几种因素对通路富集分析的影响。
Brief Bioinform. 2022 May 13;23(3). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac143.